The Growth of Chinese Think Tanks and the Question of Crime

被引:0
作者
McCaffree K. [1 ]
机构
[1] University of North Texas, Denton, TX
关键词
China; Criminology; Guanxi; Social capital; Think tanks;
D O I
10.1007/s12140-018-9283-8
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper reviews several of the key issues that underlie the development and expansion of think tanks in China from both a domestic and international perspective. Substantively, the review focuses on the need to develop criminological think tanks in China due to the well-documented relationship between rapid urbanization, social displacement, and crime. Though work on urbanization, social disorganization, and crime has existed for over half a decade in Western criminology, it suffers from a lack of research outside of the Western and usually more specifically American, cultural context. To advance this call for research, the paper identifies 14 generative research programs in the areas of the Routine Activities Theory, Social Bonds Theory, and Institutional Anomie Theory pursuable by Chinese criminological think tanks. The paper concludes with a brief discussion of some potential barriers to the successful production and dissemination of criminological research in China. © 2018, Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 58
页数:15
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Xi J., Secure a Decisive Victory in Building a Moderately Prosperous Society in All Respects and Strive for the Great Success of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era, Address to the 19Th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, (2017)
[2]  
McGann J.G., 2016 Global Go to Think Tank Index Report. Resource Document, (2016)
[3]  
Mendizabal E., Think Tanks in China: A Golden Age?, Resource Document. on Think Tanks, (2016)
[4]  
Chan J.L., China’s knowledge strategy: 100 new think tanks, one school of thought, Public Money & Management, 37, 4, pp. 240-242, (2017)
[5]  
Osnos E., Age of ambition: chasing fortune, truth, and faith in the new China., (2014)
[6]  
Hirschi T., Causes of Delinquency, (1969)
[7]  
Chamlin M.B., Cochran J.K., Assessing Messner and Rosenfeld’s institutional anomie theory: A partial test, Criminology, 33, 3, pp. 411-429, (1995)
[8]  
Savolainen J., Inequality, welfare state, and homicide: Further support for the institutional anomie theory, Criminology, 38, 4, pp. 1021-1042, (2000)
[9]  
Maume M.O., Lee M.R., Social institutions and violence: a sub-national test of institutional anomie theory, Criminology, 41, 4, pp. 1137-1172, (2003)
[10]  
Bjerregaard B., Cochran J.K., A cross-national test of institutional anomie theory: do the strength of other social institutions mediate or moderate the effects of the economy on the rate of crime, Western Criminology Review, 9, 1, pp. 31-48, (2008)