Forgiveness and Reconciliation in the Workplace: A Multi-Level Perspective and Research Agenda

被引:0
作者
Michael E. Palanski
机构
[1] Saunders College of Business,
[2] Rochester Institute of Technology,undefined
来源
Journal of Business Ethics | 2012年 / 109卷
关键词
Apologies; Conflict resolution; Deviant workplace behaviors; Forgiveness; Levels of analysis; Organizational citizenship behaviors; Reconciliation; Workplace violence;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Forgiveness and reconciliation have been shown to be beneficial alternatives to revenge as responses to an interpersonal offense in the workplace. Prior research on these topics, however, is often narrow in scope, focusing on only the victim. Moreover, existing research is often unclear about the relationship between forgiveness and reconciliation. In response, this article proposes a conceptual framework of forgiveness, reconciliation, and their respective antecedents which is both multi-level and interdisciplinary. This framework is used to review the nascent management-related research on forgiveness and reconciliation, and to augment this research from other fields, especially social psychology. Future research directions and managerial implications are proposed based on the multi-level model and research from other fields.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 287
页数:12
相关论文
共 103 条
[1]  
Andersson LM(1999)Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace Academy of Management Review 24 452-471
[2]  
Pearson CM(2003)Identity threat and antisocial behavior in organizations: The moderating effects of individual differences, aggressive modeling, and hierarchical status Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 90 195-208
[3]  
Aquino K(2003)When push doesn’t come to shove: Interpersonal forgiveness in workplace relationships Journal of Management Inquiry 12 209-216
[4]  
Douglas S(2004)A relational model of workplace victimization: Social roles and patterns of victimization in dyadic relationships Journal of Applied Psychology 89 1023-1034
[5]  
Aquino K(2009)Workplace victimization: Aggression from the target’s perspective Annual Review of Psychology 60 717-741
[6]  
Grover SL(2001)How employees respond to personal offense: The effects of blame attribution, victim status, and offender status on revenge and reconciliation in the workplace Journal of Applied Psychology 86 52-59
[7]  
Goldman B(2006)Getting even or moving on? Procedural justice and types of offense as predictors of revenge, forgiveness, reconciliation, and avoidance in organizations Journal of Applied Psychology 91 653-668
[8]  
Folger R(1999)The effects of blame attributions and offender likableness on forgiveness and revenge in the workplace Journal of Management 25 607-631
[9]  
Aquino K(2004)Vengeance is mine: Narcissism, vengeance, and the tendency to forgive Journal of Research in Personality 38 576-584
[10]  
Lamertz K(2002)“Languaging” factors affecting clients’ acceptance of forgiveness intervention in marital therapy Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 28 285-297