How do agricultural subsidies affect farmers’ non-grain cultivated land production? Evidence from the fourth rural Chinese households panel data survey

被引:0
作者
Shilei Pan
Chenhui Di
Zhiguang Qu
Abbas Ali Chandio
Abdul Rehman
Huaquan Zhang
机构
[1] Sichuan Agricultural University,College of Economics
[2] Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,School of Information and Security Engineering
[3] Henan Agricultural University,College of Economics and Management
来源
Economia Politica | 2024年 / 41卷
关键词
Agricultural subsidies; Non-grain; Absolute rent; Food security; China; Q15; Q18; D13;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
China has a low per-capita availability of arable land. The proportionate revenue generated by grain production has seen a modest increase in contrast to the general progress of the entire country. Since 2004, the Chinese government has openly adopted agricultural subsidy programs to stimulate the enthusiasm of small farmers for cultivating grain. During the early stages of policy implementation, it has a major impact on grain yield, but its impact is reducing. The four-period panel data from the CRHPS are used to empirically investigate the link between agricultural subsidies and non-grain production of cultivated land (NGPCL). The study is carried out to empirically examine Marx’s theory of absolute rent in order to understand the factors that contribute to the weakening of the impact of agricultural subsidy policy. The findings suggest that while the impact of agriculture subsidy policy is decreasing, it still hinders the expansion of the NGPCL. Agricultural subsidies impede the movement of farmers from the agricultural sector to other industries by impacting the fixed rent paid for cultivated land. This, in turn, promotes the persistence of the NGPCL, which could be a significant factor in reducing the effectiveness of agricultural subsidy policies. For households where the householder is in better health, agricultural subsidies inhibit the NGPCL more effectively. At various stages of the family life cycle, agricultural subsidies have a similar impact on the NGPCL. In addition, further study indicates that increasing the precision of agricultural subsidy policy could contribute to a greater impact of agricultural subsidies on the NGPCL. According to the conclusion of the research, we propose the optimal direction for China’s agricultural subsidy policy.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 24
页数:23
相关论文
共 146 条
[1]  
Bi XH(2020)The Effect of Operation Scale on farmers’ planting structure selection under the constraints of Family Labor China Land Science 34 68-77
[2]  
Zhou JN(2020)The role of the Common Agricultural Policy in Enhancing Farm Income: A dynamic panel analysis accounting for farm size in Italy Journal of Agricultural Economics 71 652-675
[3]  
Zou W(2017)Agricultural pollution and regulation: How to subsidize agriculture? Journal of Cleaner Production 164 258-264
[4]  
Biagini L(2021)The capitalization of Agricultural subsidies into Land prices Annual Review of Resource Economics 13 17-38
[5]  
Antonioli F(2022)Do direct payments efficiently support incomes of small and large farms? European Review of Agricultural Economics 49 796-831
[6]  
Severini S(2016)The political effects of Agricultural subsidies in Africa: Evidence from Malawi World Development 87 215-226
[7]  
Chen YH(2019)On the new deal of agricultural product price support and its impact on the international competitiveness of agriculture Journal of Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics 04 91-100
[8]  
Wen XW(2019)Subsidies and agricultural productivity in the EU Agricultural Economics 50 803-817
[9]  
Wang B(2011)Do China’s agricultural policies matter for world commodity markets? China Agricultural Economic Review 3 6-25
[10]  
Nie PY(2018)Rethinking the credit demand and availability of farm household Issues in Agricultural Economy 02 38-49