Influence of research evidence on the use of cardiovascular clinical prediction rules in primary care: an exploratory qualitative interview study

被引：0
作者：
Jong- Wook Ban
Rafael Perera
Veronika Williams
机构：
[1] University of Oxford,Centre for Evidence
[2] University of Oxford,Based Medicine
[3] University of Oxford,Department for Continuing Education
[4] Nipissing University,Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences
来源：
BMC Primary Care | / 24卷
关键词：
Clinical prediction rule; Research evidence; Primary care; Evidence-based medicine;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 435 条
[1]  
Ioannidis JP(2016)Why Most Clinical Research Is Not Useful PLoS Med 13 283-284
[2]  
Altman DG(1994)The scandal of poor medical research BMJ 308 86-89
[3]  
Chalmers I(2009)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence Lancet 374 166-175
[4]  
Glasziou P(2014)Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis Lancet 383 176-185
[5]  
Ioannidis JP(2014)Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research regulation and management Lancet 383 257-266
[6]  
Greenland S(2014)Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research Lancet 383 267-276
[7]  
Hlatky MA(2014)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research Lancet 383 156-165
[8]  
Khoury MJ(2014)How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set Lancet 383 79-84
[9]  
Macleod MR(2000)Users' guides to the medical literature: XXII: how to use articles about clinical decision rules Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 284 1085-1094
[10]  
Moher D(2008)Validation, updating and impact of clinical prediction rules: a review J Clin Epidemiol 61 e233-242
12345678910