Reward learning and statistical learning independently influence attentional priority of salient distractors in visual search

被引:0
作者
Mike E. Le Pelley
Rhonda Ung
Chisato Mine
Steven B. Most
Poppy Watson
Daniel Pearson
Jan Theeuwes
机构
[1] UNSW Sydney,School of Psychology
[2] National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST),Department of Information Technology and Human Factors, Human
[3] Japan Society for the Promotion of Science,Centered Mobility Research Center
[4] Vrije Universiteit,Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology
来源
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics | 2022年 / 84卷
关键词
Attention; Reward; Suppression; Statistical learning; Visual search;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Existing research demonstrates different ways in which attentional prioritization of salient nontarget stimuli is shaped by prior experience: Reward learning renders signals of high-value outcomes more likely to capture attention than signals of low-value outcomes, whereas statistical learning can produce attentional suppression of the location in which salient distractor items are likely to appear. The current study combined manipulations of the value and location associated with salient distractors in visual search to investigate whether these different effects of selection history operate independently or interact to determine overall attentional prioritization of salient distractors. In Experiment 1, high-value and low-value distractors most frequently appeared in the same location; in Experiment 2, high-value and low-value distractors typically appeared in distinct locations. In both experiments, effects of distractor value and location were additive, suggesting that attention-promoting effects of value and attention-suppressing effects of statistical location-learning independently modulate overall attentional priority. Our findings are consistent with a view that sees attention as mediated by a common priority map that receives and integrates separate signals relating to physical salience and value, with signal suppression based on statistical learning determined by physical salience, but not incentive salience.
引用
收藏
页码:1446 / 1459
页数:13
相关论文
共 140 条
[1]  
Anderson BA(2016)The attention habit: How reward learning shapes attentional selection Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1369 24-39
[2]  
Anderson BA(2011)Value-driven attentional capture Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108 10367-10371
[3]  
Laurent PA(2012)Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: A failed theoretical dichotomy Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16 437-443
[4]  
Yantis S(2015)Common priority map for selection history, reward and emotion in the oculomotor system Perception 44 920-933
[5]  
Awh E(1998)What is the role of dopamine in reward: Hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience? Brain Research Reviews 28 309-369
[6]  
Belopolsky AV(1998)Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention Cognitive Psychology 36 28-71
[7]  
Theeuwes J(2020)Mapping sign-tracking and goal-tracking onto human behaviors Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 111 84-94
[8]  
Belopolsky AV(2015)jsPsych: A JavaScript library for creating behavioral experiments in a web browser Behavior Research Methods 47 1-12
[9]  
Berridge KC(2014)Exogenous visual orienting by reward Journal of Vision 14 9-538
[10]  
Robinson TE(2018)Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 25 514-95