A Proposed Staging System for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

被引:0
作者
Hari Nathan
Thomas A. Aloia
Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
Eddie K. Abdalla
Andrew X. Zhu
Richard D. Schulick
Michael A. Choti
Timothy M. Pawlik
机构
[1] The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,Department of Surgery
[2] The Methodist Hospital,Department of Surgery
[3] The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center,Department of Surgical Oncology
[4] Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center,Department of Hematology
来源
Annals of Surgical Oncology | 2009年 / 16卷
关键词
Staging System; Vascular Invasion; Multiple Imputation; Complete Case; Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)/International Union Against Cancer (UICC) staging system for liver cancer is based on data exclusively derived from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients and thus may be inappropriate for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). We sought to empirically derive an ICC staging system from population-based data on patients with ICC. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify 598 patients who underwent surgery for ICC between 1988 and 2004. The discriminative abilities of the AJCC/UICC liver cancer and two Japanese ICC staging systems were evaluated. Independent predictors of survival were identified using Cox proportional hazards models. A staging system for ICC was then derived based on these analyses. The AJCC/UICC T classification system failed to adequately stratify the T2 and T3 cohorts due to tumor size >5 cm not being a relevant prognostic factor [hazard ratio (HR) 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72–1.30]. In contrast, presence of multiple lesions (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.01–2.01) or vascular invasion (HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.10–2.12) predicted adverse prognosis. Based on these findings, an ICC staging system was developed that omits tumor size. This system showed no loss of prognostic discrimination compared with the AJCC/UICC system and significant superiority over the Japanese systems. We conclude that the AJCC/UICC liver cancer staging system fails to stratify ICC patients adequately and inappropriately includes tumor size. We propose a staging system specifically developed for ICC based on number of tumors, vascular invasion, lymph node status, and presence of metastatic disease.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 22
页数:8
相关论文
共 105 条
[1]  
Kaczynski J(1990)Primary liver cancer in Japan. Clinicopathologic features and results of surgical treatment Ann Surg 211 277-87
[2]  
Hansson G(1998)Incidence, etiologic aspects and clinicopathologic features in intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma–a study of 51 cases from a low-endemicity area Acta Oncol. 37 77-83
[3]  
Wallerstedt S(2004)The epidemiology of cholangiocarcinoma Semin Liver Dis. 24 115-25
[4]  
Shaib Y(2006)Impact of classification of hilar cholangiocarcinomas (Klatskin tumors) on the incidence of intra- and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States J Natl Cancer Inst. 98 873-5
[5]  
El-Serag HB(2003)Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: macroscopic type and stage classification J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 10 288-91
[6]  
Welzel TM(2002)Simplified staging for hepatocellular carcinoma J Clin Oncol. 20 1527-36
[7]  
McGlynn KA(1991)Liver cancer in Thailand I. A case-control study of cholangiocarcinoma Int J Cancer 48 323-8
[8]  
Hsing AW(1991)Liver cancer in Thailand II. A case-control study of hepatocellular carcinoma Int J Cancer 48 329-32
[9]  
O’Brien TR(1991)The role of infection by Opisthorchis viverrini, hepatitis B virus, and aflatoxin exposure in the etiology of liver cancer in Thailand A correlation study Cancer 68 2411-7
[10]  
Pfeiffer RM(1993)A multivariate analysis of risk factors for hepatocellular carcinogenesis: a prospective observation of 795 patients with viral and alcoholic cirrhosis Hepatology. 18 47-53