High failure rate of the interspinous distraction device (X-Stop) for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis caused by degenerative spondylolisthesis

被引:0
|
作者
Olaf J. Verhoof
Johannes L. Bron
Frits H. Wapstra
Barend J. van Royen
机构
[1] VU University Medical Center,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
来源
European Spine Journal | 2008年 / 17卷
关键词
Lumbar spinal stenosis; X-Stop; Degenerative spondylolisthesis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The X-Stop interspinous distraction device has shown to be an attractive alternative to conventional surgical procedures in the treatment of symptomatic degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. However, the effectiveness of the X-Stop in symptomatic degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis caused by degenerative spondylolisthesis is not known. A cohort of 12 consecutive patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis caused by degenerative spondylolisthesis were treated with the X-Stop interspinous distraction device. All patients had low back pain, neurogenic claudication and radiculopathy. Pre-operative radiographs revealed an average slip of 19.6%. MRI of the lumbosacral spine showed a severe stenosis. In ten patients, the X-Stop was placed at the L4–5 level, whereas two patients were treated at both, L3–4 and L4–5 level. The mean follow-up was 30.3 months. In eight patients a complete relief of symptoms was observed post-operatively, whereas the remaining 4 patients experienced no relief of symptoms. Recurrence of pain, neurogenic claudication, and worsening of neurological symptoms was observed in three patients within 24 months. Post-operative radiographs and MRI did not show any changes in the percentage of slip or spinal dimensions. Finally, secondary surgical treatment by decompression with posterolateral fusion was performed in seven patients (58%) within 24 months. In conclusion, the X-Stop interspinous distraction device showed an extremely high failure rate, defined as surgical re-intervention, after short term follow-up in patients with spinal stenosis caused by degenerative spondylolisthesis. We do not recommend the X-Stop for the treatment of spinal stenosis complicating degenerative spondylolisthesis.
引用
收藏
页码:188 / 192
页数:4
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [31] Mean 5-Year Follow-Up Results of a Facet Replacement Device in the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
    Haleem, Shahnawaz
    Ahmed, Awaiz
    Ganesan, Satish
    Stephen, McGillion F.
    Fowler, John L.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 152 : e645 - e651
  • [32] Decompression and paraspinous tension band: a novel treatment method for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis
    Gibson, J. N. Alastair
    Depreitere, Bart
    Pflugmacher, Robert
    Schnake, Klaus J.
    Fielding, Louis C.
    Alamin, Todd F.
    Goffin, Jan
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 15 (03) : 23S - 32S
  • [33] The effect of the X-Stop implantation on intervertebral foramen, segmental spinal canal length and disc space in elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis
    Wan, Zongmiao
    Wang, Shaobai
    Kozanek, Michal
    Xia, Qun
    Mansfield, Frederick L.
    Lu, Guohua
    Wood, Kirkham B.
    Li, Guoan
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2012, 21 (03) : 400 - 410
  • [34] The effect of the X-Stop implantation on intervertebral foramen, segmental spinal canal length and disc space in elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis
    Zongmiao Wan
    Shaobai Wang
    Michal Kozanek
    Qun Xia
    Frederick L. Mansfield
    Guohua Lü
    Kirkham B. Wood
    Guoan Li
    European Spine Journal, 2012, 21 : 400 - 410
  • [35] A prospective randomized multi-center study for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the X STOP interspinous implant: 1-year results
    Zucherman, JF
    Hsu, KY
    Hartjen, CA
    Mehalic, TF
    Implicito, DA
    Martin, MJ
    Johnson, DR
    Skidmore, GA
    Vessa, PP
    Dwyer, JW
    Puccio, S
    Cauthen, JC
    Ozuna, RM
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2004, 13 (01) : 22 - 31
  • [36] A prospective randomized multi-center study for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the X STOP interspinous implant: 1-year results
    J. F. Zucherman
    K. Y. Hsu
    C. A. Hartjen
    T. F. Mehalic
    D. A. Implicito
    M. J. Martin
    D. R. Johnson
    G. A. Skidmore
    P. P. Vessa
    J. W. Dwyer
    S. Puccio
    J. C. Cauthen
    R. M. Ozuna
    European Spine Journal, 2004, 13 : 22 - 31
  • [37] RETRACTED ARTICLE: Comparison of two FDA-approved interspinous spacers for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: Superion versus X-STOP—a meta-analysis from five randomized controlled trial studies
    He Zhao
    Li-Jun Duan
    Yu-Shan Gao
    Yong-Dong Yang
    Ding-Yan Zhao
    Xiang-Sheng Tang
    Zhen-guo Hu
    Chuan-Hong Li
    Si-Xue Chen
    Tao Liu
    Xing Yu
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 13
  • [38] An interspinous process distractor (X STOP) for lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients - Preliminary experiences in 10 consecutive coses
    Lee, JB
    Hida, K
    Seki, T
    Iwasaki, Y
    Minoru, A
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2004, 17 (01): : 72 - 77
  • [39] Evaluation of the Therapeutic Effect of Decompression with or without Fusion on Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Caused by Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Guo, Jie
    Fan, Yonggang
    Diao, Han
    Fan, Jigeng
    Zhang, Jiawei
    Li, Jianwei
    Xiao, Donglun
    Su, Runbang
    Zhang, Ying
    Sun, Tianwei
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2025, 194
  • [40] Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety between Interspinous Process Distraction Device and Open Decompression Surgery in Treating Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Meta Analysis
    Hong, Peiwei
    Liu, Yao
    Li, Hedong
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE SURGERY, 2015, 28 (01) : 40 - 49