The ratio between anterior abdominal wall surface/wall defect surface: A new parameter to classify abdominal incisional hernias

被引:14
作者
Ammaturo C. [1 ]
Bassi G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hospital S.M. di Loreto Nuovo, 80040 San Gennaro Ves, Napoli
关键词
Classification of incisional hernias; Parietex composite; Ratio between anterior abdominal area/wall defect area;
D O I
10.1007/s10029-005-0016-8
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Current classifications of incisional hernias are often not suitable. The aim of our study was to demonstrate that it is important to consider not only the wall defect surface (WDS) but also the total surface of the anterior abdominal wall (SAW) and the ratio between SAW/WDS). Twenty-three patients affected by >10 cm size incisional hernias were examined for anthropometric analyses. The SAW, the WDS and the ratio SAW/ WDS were calculated. All of the 23 patients were operated on 13 patients were treated with the Rives technique using a polypropylene mesh while the remaning ten patients had an intraperitoneal Parietex Composite mesh (PC). The two groups were compared for post-operative pain (with VAS) and intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) 48 h after the operation: bladder pressure, length of the procedure, average hospital stay and return to work were calculated. In the Rives group, WDS being equal, the higher IAP values were, the lower was the ratio SAW/WDS; furthermore, SAW/WDS ratio being equal, IAP values were low in cases where intraperitoneal mesh was used. Post-operative pain, measured with VAS, was critical when there was a low SAW/WDS ratio and a high IAP. In our experience, it is possible to predict a strong abdominal wall tension if the SAW/WDA ratio is below 15 mmHg. In these cases it is advisable to use a technique requiring the use of an intraperitoneal mesh. Our experience with PC was so positive that it is used in our department for all cases where an intraperitoneal mesh is required. At present, our proposal is that the SAW/WDS ratio is to be considered as a new parameter in current classifications of incisional hernias. © Springer-Verlag 2005.
引用
收藏
页码:316 / 321
页数:5
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Chevrel J.P., Rath A.M., Classification of incisional hernias of the abdominal wall, Hernia, 4, pp. 7-11, (2000)
  • [2] Korenkov M., Paul A., Sauerland S., Neugebauer E., Arndt M., Chevrel J.P., Corcione F., Fingerhut A., Flament J.B., Kux M., Matzinger A., Myrvold H.E., Rath A.M., Simmermacher R.K.J., Classification and surgical treatment of incisional hernia. Results of an experts' meeting, Langenbecks Arch Surg, 386, pp. 65-73, (2001)
  • [3] Bucknall T.E., Factors influencing wound complications: A clinical and experimental syudy, Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 65, pp. 71-78, (1983)
  • [4] Cameron A.E., Parker E.S., Gray R.C., Wyatt A.P., A randomised comparison of polydioxanone (PDS) and polypropylene (Prolene) for abdominal wound closure, Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 69, pp. 113-115, (1987)
  • [5] Gys T., Hubens A., A prospective comparative clinical study between monofilament absorbable and non-absorbable sutures for abdominal wall closure, Acta Chir Belg, 89, pp. 265-270, (1989)
  • [6] Israelsson L.A., Jonsson T., Suture length to wound length ratio and healing of midline laparotomy incisions, Br J Surg, 80, pp. 1284-1286, (1993)
  • [7] Smith M., Enquist I.F., A quantitative study of impaired healing resulting from infection, Surg Gynecol Obstet, 125, pp. 965-973, (1967)
  • [8] Regnard J.F., Hay J.M., Rea S., Fingerhut A., Flamant Y., Maillard J.N., Ventral incisional hernias: Incidence, date of recurrence, localization and risk factors, Ital J Surg Sci, 18, 3, pp. 259-265, (1988)
  • [9] Sauerland S., Korenkov M., Kleinen T., Arndt M., Paul A., Obesity is a risk factor for recurrence after incisional hernia repair, Eur J Surg, 167, 11, pp. 855-859, (2001)
  • [10] Baggish M.S., Lee W.K., Abdominal wall disruption, Obstet Gynecol, 46, pp. 530-534, (1975)