Outbreak dynamics of COVID-19 in China and the United States

被引:0
作者
Mathias Peirlinck
Kevin Linka
Francisco Sahli Costabal
Ellen Kuhl
机构
[1] Stanford University,Departments of Mechanical Engineering and Bioengineering
[2] Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile,Department of Mechanical and Metallurgical Engineering, School of Engineering and Institute for Biological and Medical Engineering, Schools of Engineering, Medicine and Biological Sciences
来源
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology | 2020年 / 19卷
关键词
Coronavirus; COVID-19; Epidemiology modeling; SEIR model; Network model;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the coronavirus disease 2019, COVID-19, a global pandemic. In an unprecedented collective effort, massive amounts of data are now being collected worldwide to estimate the immediate and long-term impact of this pandemic on the health system and the global economy. However, the precise timeline of the disease, its transmissibility, and the effect of mitigation strategies remain incompletely understood. Here we integrate a global network model with a local epidemic SEIR model to quantify the outbreak dynamics of COVID-19 in China and the United States. For the outbreak in China, in n=30\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$n=30$$\end{document} provinces, we found a latent period of 2.56 ± 0.72 days, a contact period of 1.47 ± 0.32 days, and an infectious period of 17.82 ± 2.95 days. We postulate that the latent and infectious periods are disease-specific, whereas the contact period is behavior-specific and can vary between different provinces, states, or countries. For the early stages of the outbreak in the United States, in n=50\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$n=50$$\end{document} states, we adopted the disease-specific values from China and found a contact period of 3.38 ± 0.69 days. Our network model predicts that—without the massive political mitigation strategies that are in place today—the United States would have faced a basic reproduction number of 5.30 ± 0.95 and a nationwide peak of the outbreak on May 10, 2020 with 3 million infections. Our results demonstrate how mathematical modeling can help estimate outbreak dynamics and provide decision guidelines for successful outbreak control. We anticipate that our model will become a valuable tool to estimate the potential of vaccination and quantify the effect of relaxing political measures including total lockdown, shelter in place, and travel restrictions for low-risk subgroups of the population or for the population as a whole.
引用
收藏
页码:2179 / 2193
页数:14
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
Anderson RM(1982)Directly transmitted infectious diseases: control by vaccination Science 215 1053-1060
[2]  
May RM(1984)Seasonality and period-doubling bifurcation in an epidemic model J Theor Biol 110 665-679
[3]  
Aron JL(2009)Multiscale mobility networks and the spatial spreading of infectious diseases Proc Natl Acad Sci 106 21484-21489
[4]  
Schwartz IB(2006)The role of the airline transportation network in the prediction and predictability of global epidemics Proc Natl Acad Sci 103 2015-2020
[5]  
Balcan D(2019)Complexity of the basic reproduction number ( Emerg Infect Dis 25 1-4
[6]  
Colizza V(1993)) Stat Methods Med Res 2 23-41
[7]  
Goncalves B(2020)The estimation of the basic reproduction number for infectious diseases J Med Virol 15 265-302
[8]  
Hu H(1993)Transmission dynamics of the COVID-19 outbreak and effectiveness of government interventions: a data-driven analysis Epidemiol Rev 16 20190356-653
[9]  
Jamasco J(2019)Herd immunity: history, theory, practice J R Soc Interface 42 599-266
[10]  
Vespignani A(2000)Prion-like spreading of Alzheimer’s disease within the brain’s connectome SIAM Rev 91 264-721