Drug retention of 7 biologics and tofacitinib in biologics-naïve and biologics-switched patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the ANSWER cohort study

被引:0
作者
Kosuke Ebina
Toru Hirano
Yuichi Maeda
Wataru Yamamoto
Motomu Hashimoto
Koichi Murata
Tohru Takeuchi
Hideyuki Shiba
Yonsu Son
Hideki Amuro
Akira Onishi
Kengo Akashi
Ryota Hara
Masaki Katayama
Keiichi Yamamoto
Atsushi Kumanogoh
Makoto Hirao
机构
[1] Osaka University,Department of Musculoskeletal Regenerative Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine
[2] Osaka University,Department of Respiratory Medicine and Clinical Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine
[3] Kurashiki Sweet Hospital,Department of Health Information Management
[4] Kyoto University,Department of Advanced Medicine for Rheumatic Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine
[5] Osaka Medical College,Department of Internal Medicine (IV)
[6] Kansai Medical University,First Department of Internal Medicine
[7] Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine,Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology
[8] Nara Medical University,The Center for Rheumatic Diseases
[9] Osaka Red Cross Hospital,Department of Rheumatology
[10] Wakayama Medical University Hospital,Department of Medical Informatics
[11] Osaka University,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
[12] Graduate School of Medicine,undefined
来源
Arthritis Research & Therapy | / 22卷
关键词
ANSWER cohort; Biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; Drug retention; Rheumatoid arthritis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 279 条
[1]  
Du Pan SM(2009)Comparison of drug retention rates and causes of drug discontinuation between anti-tumor necrosis factor agents in rheumatoid arthritis Arthritis Rheum 61 560-568
[2]  
Dehler S(2016)Twelve-year retention rate of first-line tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: real-life data from a local registry Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 68 432-439
[3]  
Ciurea A(2010)Direct comparison of treatment responses, remission rates, and drug adherence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with adalimumab, etanercept, or infliximab: results from eight years of surveillance of clinical practice in the nationwide Danish DANBIO registry Arthritis Rheum 62 22-32
[4]  
Ziswiler HR(2015)Drug survival on TNF inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis comparison of adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab Ann Rheum Dis 74 354-360
[5]  
Gabay C(2016)Rate of discontinuation and drug survival of biologic therapies in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of drug registries and health care databases Rheumatology (Oxford) 55 523-534
[6]  
Finckh A(2017)EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2016 update Ann Rheum Dis 76 960-977
[7]  
Favalli EG(2015)Rheumatoid arthritis therapy reappraisal: strategies, opportunities and challenges Nat Rev Rheumatol 11 276-289
[8]  
Pregnolato F(2012)Differential drug retention between anti-TNF agents and alternative biological agents after inadequate response to an anti-TNF agent in rheumatoid arthritis patients Ann Rheum Dis 71 997-999
[9]  
Biggioggero M(2014)Survival on treatment with second-line biologic therapy: a cohort study comparing cycling and swap strategies Rheumatology (Oxford) 53 1664-1668
[10]  
Becciolini A(2004)Why results of clinical trials and observational studies of antitumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy differ: methodological and interpretive issues Ann Rheum Dis 63 ii13-ii17