Efficacy of Probiotics Supplementation on the Prognosis of Patients After Liver Transplantation: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
JinShuang Xu
YuShuang Xu
Yu Song
机构
[1] Jiaozhou Hospital of Tongji University DongFang Hospital,Division of Nephrology
[2] Liyuan Hospital,Division of Gastroenterology
[3] Tongji Medical College,Division of Gastroenterology
[4] Huazhong University of Science and Technology,undefined
[5] Jiaozhou Hospital of Tongji University DongFang Hospital,undefined
来源
Indian Journal of Surgery | 2022年 / 84卷
关键词
Probiotics; Liver transplantation; Prognosis; Meta-analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Preclinical evidence suggests that gut microbiome regulation may prove to be a new therapeutic target for treating postoperative infection in liver transplant recipients. This review aims to evaluate the most current evidence for the efficacy of probiotics supplementation on postoperative prognosis. The registered through the International prospective register of systematic reviews as CRD42020170379. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for studies published from 1 Jan 1963 to 31 May 2021. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Study heterogeneity was assessed with the Cochrane Q test and I2 statistic. We applied leave-one-out sensitivity analysis to assess the effect of every single study on the heterogeneity and pooled effect size. Egger’s test and observation of funnel plots were used to detecting small-study effects and publication bias. A total of five studies, including 290 patients, were enrolled in the final analysis. Probiotics supplementation resulted in a beneficial outcome both in postoperative infection (RR = 0.199, 95%CI: 0.105 ~ 0.377, p = 0.000), the duration of antibiotic therapy (WMD = 3.031, 95%CI: − 5.905 ~  − 0.157, p = 0.039), and the length of hospital stay (SMD =  − 0.274, 95%CI: − 0.530 ~  − 0.018, p = 0.036). The main effective infection types were urinary tract infection (RR = 0.176, 95%CI: 0.063 ~ 0.496, p = 0.001) and intraabdominal infection (RR = 0.225, 95%CI: 0.084 ~ 0.607, p = 0.003), but not pneumonia infection (RR = 0.301, 95%CI: 0.076 ~ 1.203, p = 0.089). There were no statistically significant differences for the intensive care unit stay (WMD =  − 0.752, 95%CI: − 1.819 ~  − 0.315, p = 0.167) and postoperative mortality (RR = 0.794, 95%CI: 0.210 ~ 3.008, p = 0.734) in the two groups. Probiotics supplementation as an effective assistant treatment for reducing postoperative infection rates, the duration of antibiotic therapy, and the length of hospital stay after liver transplantation has application prospects.
引用
收藏
页码:409 / 417
页数:8
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
Rude MK(2014)Recurrent hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma after orthotopic liver transplantation Hepatol 59 2050-2052
[2]  
Watson R(2012)Analysis of infections in the first 3-month after living donor liver transplantation World J Gastroenterol 18 1975-1980
[3]  
Crippin JS(2020)Complications Following Liver Transplant at a Teaching Hospital Transplant Proc 52 1354-1359
[4]  
Li C(2014)Bacterial infection after liver transplantation World J Gastroenterol 20 6211-6220
[5]  
Knihs NDS(1999)Selective decontamination of the digestive tract helps prevent bacterial infections in the early postoperative period after liver transplant Mt Sinai J Med 66 310-3
[6]  
Kim SI(2013)Antibiotic treatment expands the resistance reservoir and ecological network of the phage metagenome Nature 499 219-222
[7]  
Emre SSA(2002)A randomized, prospective, double-blinded evaluation of selective bowel decontamination in liver transplantation Transplantation 27 1904-9
[8]  
Chodoff L(2018)Organ transplantation and gut microbiota: current reviews and future challenges Am J Transl Res 15 3330-3344
[9]  
Boccagni P(2005)Supply of pre- and probiotics reduces bacterial infection rates after liver transplantation–a randomized, double-blind trial Am J Transplant 5 125-130
[10]  
Meyers B(2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews BMJ 372 n160-147