Process optimization of biogas recovery from giant reed (Arundo donax) alternatively pretreated with acid and oxidant agent: experimental and kinetic study

被引:0
作者
Nazik A. Noori
Zainab Z. Ismail
机构
[1] University of Baghdad,Department of Environmental Engineering
来源
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery | 2020年 / 10卷
关键词
Giant reed; Co-digestion; Biogas; Cellulose; Manure; Gompertz model;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study focused on biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of grinded giant reed (Arundo donax) (GGR). The performance of co-digestion process was evaluated in bench-scale digesters operated in batch mode at different conditions. The effect of GGR particle size, pretreatment method, inoculum type, and thermal conditions were studied. The results demonstrated that biogas production was affected by the size of GGR particles and it was in the order of small (0.3–0.6 mm) > medium (0.6–1.18 mm) > large (1.18–2.36 mm). Maximum cumulative biogas productions were 94.24, 73.60, and 69.82 for small, medium, and large particle size of GGR, respectively. Biogas generation from H2O2-pretreated GGR and H2SO4-pretreated GGR exceeded its amounts from chemical-free GGR by 200% and 36%, respectively. The results indicated that biogas production from chemical-free GGR, H2SO4-pretreated GGR, and H2O2-pretreated GGR at thermophilic conditions exceeded its recovery rate at mesophilic conditions by 11%, 17%, and 26%, respectively. A relatively, higher rates of biogas generation of 67%, 56%, and 100% were observed from the co-digestion of GGR with chicken dung compared with cattle manure for the chemical-free GGR, H2SO4-pretreated GGR, and H2O2-pretreated GGR, respectively. The kinetic study of the co-digestion process was carried out using modified Gompertz model. A significant agreement was observed between the predicted and measured values of biogas recovery with determination coefficients ≥ 0.96 indicating favorable conditions for the co-digestion of inoculated GGR.
引用
收藏
页码:1121 / 1135
页数:14
相关论文
共 99 条
[1]  
Kumar P(2009)Methods for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for efficient hydrolysis and biofuel production Ind Eng Chem Res 48 3713-3729
[2]  
Barrett DM(2008)Influence of wastewater characteristics on methane potential in food-processing industry wastewaters Water Res 42 2195-2203
[3]  
Delwiche MJ(2014)Environmental assessment of two different crop systems in terms of biomethane potential production Sci Total Environ 466-467 1066-1077
[4]  
Strove P(2018)The characterization and treatment of food waste for improvement of biogas production during anaerobic digestion – a review J Clean Prod 172 1545-1558
[5]  
Altamira ML(1985)The Bradley method of eliminating exotic plants from natural reserves Fremontia 13 24-26
[6]  
Baun A(2014)Biogas production from rice husks generated from various rice mills in Ebonyi state, Nigeria Renew Energy 62 204-208
[7]  
Angelidaki I(2014)Assessment of anaerobic co-digestion of agro wastes for biogas recovery: a bench scale application to date palm wastes Int J Energy Environ 5 591-600
[8]  
Schmidt JE(2015)Experimental and economical evaluation of bioconversion of forest residues to biogas using organosolv pretreatment Bioresour Technol 178 201-208
[9]  
Bacenetti J(2016)Anaerobic co-digestion of catering waste with partially pretreated lignocellulosic crop residues J Clean Prod 117 56-63
[10]  
Fusi A(2016)Recycled medical cotton industry waste as a source of biogas recovery J Clean Prod 112 4413-4418