Learning from the history of disaster vulnerability and resilience research and practice for climate change

被引:0
作者
I. Kelman
J. C. Gaillard
James Lewis
Jessica Mercer
机构
[1] University College London,Institute for Risk and Disaster Reduction and Institute for Global Health
[2] Norwegian Institute for International Affairs (NUPI),School of Environment
[3] The University of Auckland,undefined
[4] Datum International,undefined
来源
Natural Hazards | 2016年 / 82卷
关键词
Climate change; Disasters; Development; History; Resilience; Vulnerability;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Humanity has long sought to explain and understand why environmental processes and phenomena contribute to and interfere with development processes, frequently through the terms and concepts of ‘vulnerability’ and ‘resilience’. Many proven ideas and approaches from development and disaster risk reduction literature are not fully considered by contemporary climate change work. This chapter describes the importance of older vulnerability and resilience research for contemporary investigations involving climate change, suggesting ways forward without disciplinary blinkers. Vulnerability and resilience as processes are explored alongside critiques of the post-disaster ‘return to normal’ paradigm. The importance of learning from already existing literature and experience is demonstrated for ensuring that complete vulnerability and resilience processes are accounted for by placing climate change within other contemporary development concerns.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 143
页数:14
相关论文
共 157 条
  • [11] Reeves OS(2007)Restoration of the Mississippi Delta: lessons from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita Science 315 1679-1684
  • [12] Schubert CA Sierra(1999)Risk transference and related trends: driving forces towards more mega-disasters Environ Hazards 1 69-75
  • [13] Cuny FC(2006)Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses Glob Environ Change 16 253-267
  • [14] Day JW(1998)Making women visible in disasters: problematising the private domain Disasters 22 126-143
  • [15] Boesch DF(1999)Participatory planning for flood mitigation: models and approaches Aust J Emerg Manag 13 27-34
  • [16] Clairain EJ(2007)Resilience of traditional societies in facing natural hazards Disaster Prevent Manag 16 522-544
  • [17] Kemp GP(2010)Vulnerability, capacity, and resilience: perspectives for climate and disaster risk reduction J Int Dev 22 218-232
  • [18] Laska SB(2008)Ethnic groups’ response to the 26 December 2004 earthquake and tsunami in Aceh, Indonesia Nat Hazards 47 17-38
  • [19] Mitsch WJ(2004)La perspectiva histórica en la antropología del riesgo y del desastre: acercamientos metodológicos Relaciones 97 125-142
  • [20] Orth K(2000)Societal response to Hurricane Mitch and intra-versus intergenerational equity issues: whose norms should apply? Risk Anal 20 869-882