A comparative analysis of the efficacy and safety of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy performed in the supine and prone positions for the treatment of pediatric kidney stones: a single-center experience

被引:0
|
作者
Alper Bitkin
Deniz Noyan Özlü
Mithat Ekşi
Taner Kargı
Ali Emre Fakir
Ali Ayten
Hakan Polat
Ali İhsan Taşçı
机构
[1] University of Health Sciences Bakırköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital,Department of Urology
来源
Urolithiasis | / 51卷
关键词
Percutaneous; Nephrolithotomy; Prone; Supine; Pediatric;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL), which has a smaller tract size (14–20 Fr) than conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy, has been shown to be safe and effective in pediatric patients with large and complex upper urinary tract stones. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of MPCNL between the supine and prone positions in a pediatric population. The data of pediatric patients who underwent MPCNL at our center between January 2010 and March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the surgical position, the patients were divided into the prone (Group P) and supine (Group S) groups. In both groups, dilatation was performed using 14–18 Fr metallic dilators. The two groups were compared in terms of perioperative data, postoperative stone-free rates (SFRs), and complications. There were 36 (59%) patients in Group P and 25 (41%) patients in Group S. Stones were mostly located in the pelvis (49.2%) and second most frequently in the lower pole (27.9%). Fluoroscopy time was shorter in Group S but did not statistically significantly differ compared to Group P (p = 0.181). However, operation time was statistically significantly shorter in Group S (73.8 ± 35 vs. 99.8 ± 37.4 min, p = 0.008). Although there was no significant difference, relatively higher SFR were detected in Group S (88% vs. 83%, p = 0.725). Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) was performed on six (24%) patients in Group S, and the SFR was 100% among these patients. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the presence of complications (16.7% vs. 16%, p = 0.945). Both supine and prone MPCNL appear to be safe and effective in the pediatric age group, with similar stone-free and complication rates. In the supine procedure, the operation time is shortened compared to the prone. In addition, simultaneous retrograde access has the potential to increase the overall success rate of surgery.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] A comparative analysis of the efficacy and safety of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy performed in the supine and prone positions for the treatment of pediatric kidney stones: a single-center experience
    Bitkin, Alper
    Ozlu, Deniz Noyan
    Eksi, Mithat
    Kargi, Taner
    Fakir, Ali Emre
    Ayten, Ali
    Polat, Hakan
    Tasci, Ali Ihsan
    UROLITHIASIS, 2023, 51 (01)
  • [2] Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Staghorn Stones in Patients with Solitary Kidney in Prone Position or in completely Supine Position: a Single-center Experience
    Wang, Yanbo
    Hou, Yuchuan
    Jiang, Fengming
    Wang, Yan
    Wang, Chunxi
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2012, 38 (06): : 788 - 794
  • [3] Safety and efficacy of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in management of renal stones in pediatric age group
    Mahmood, Sarwar Noori
    Hama, Shakhawan
    Said, Amin
    Mohammed, Rawa O.
    Jaafar, Mzhda Sahib
    BMC NEPHROLOGY, 2025, 26 (01)
  • [4] Comparison of supine-prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy methods in the treatment of kidney stones in pediatric patients: prospective randomized study
    Eryilmaz, Recep
    Ertas, Kasim
    Aslan, Rahmi
    Sevim, Mehmet
    Keles, Muhammed Fatih
    Taken, Kerem
    UROLITHIASIS, 2024, 52 (01)
  • [5] Comparative outcomes of flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for pediatric kidney stones larger than 2 cm
    Zhang, Yu
    Li, Jun
    Jiao, Jian Wei
    Tian, Ye
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 28 (06) : 650 - 655
  • [6] Comparison of the outcomes of flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of kidney stones: a matched-pair analysis
    Rodrigues, Jose Eduardo Castro Matheus
    Vicentini, Fabio Carvalho
    Danilovic, Alexandre
    Marchini, Giovanni Scala
    Torricelli, Fabio Cesar Miranda
    Batagello, Carlos Alfredo
    Mazzucchi, Eduardo
    Nahas, William Carlos
    REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2022, 68 (10): : 1481 - 1485
  • [7] Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of 10-20-mm kidney stones in patients with ileal conduit: a comparative study
    Zhou, Chuanzhi
    Yin, Guangming
    Jiang, Zhiqiang
    Tan, Jing
    Huang, Kai
    Yuan, Peng
    MINERVA UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2023, 75 (05): : 616 - 624
  • [8] Ultra-Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Flank-Free Modified Supine Position vs Prone Position in Treatment of Pediatric Renal Pelvic and Lower Caliceal Stones
    Desoky, Esam A. E.
    Sakr, Ahmed M.
    ElSayed, Ehab R.
    Ali, Maged M.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2022, 36 (05) : 610 - 614
  • [9] Safety and efficacy of vacuum-assisted mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of renal stone disease: an analysis of stone free status and postoperative infectious complications
    Kolanukuduru, Kaushik P.
    Zaytoun, Osama
    Tillu, Neeraja
    Mandel, Asher
    Dovey, Zachary
    Buscarini, Maurizio
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2024, 50 (06): : 737 - 745
  • [10] The role of mini-PCNL as primary approach for the treatment of pediatric kidney stones in a high-income country. Ten-year single-center report
    Filippo Ghidini
    Corradino Di Pietro
    Francesco Fidanza
    Viviana Durante
    Pier Luca Ceccarelli
    Pediatric Surgery International, 39