Incidence of and Risk Factors for Aortic Arch Interventions After the Comprehensive Stage II Procedure for Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome

被引:0
作者
Annaka Gilmore
Jo Ann Davis
Samantha Low
Joanne Chisolm
John Kelly
Emily Hone
Shasha Bai
Patrick McConnell
Mark Galantowicz
Clifford L. Cua
机构
[1] Nationwide Children’s Hospital,Heart Center
来源
Pediatric Cardiology | 2022年 / 43卷
关键词
Hypoplastic left heart syndrome; Hybrid procedure; Comprehensive stage II procedure; Coarctation of the aorta;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Minimal data exist about the incidence and risk factors for arch intervention after comprehensive stage II (CSII). Goal of this study was to document incidence of arch interventions after CSII and determine if any differences existed between those who underwent an arch intervention (aiCSII) versus those did not have an intervention. Single-center retrospective chart review of all hypoplastic left heart syndrome patients who underwent a CSII between 6/1/2005 and 2/1/2020 was performed. Univariate analysis was conducted in addition to principal components analysis (PCA). One hundred patients were evaluated. Sixteen patients underwent 24 arch interventions. Age at initial arch reintervention was 1.3 ± 1.2 years (median 1.0 years, range 0.5–2.2 years). Univariate analysis showed that the aiCSII group were more likely to be female, to have had a retrograde arch intervention post-hybrid procedure, and to be younger at time of CSII. On echocardiograms, aiCSII group had significantly higher pre-CSII patent ductus arteriosus velocities, arch velocities on their 1st post-operative and discharge study post-CSII, and arch velocities pre-Fontan. Gradients were higher in the aiCSII via pre-Fontan catheterization. With PCA, echocardiographic and catheterization data remained significantly associated with aiCSII versus those who did not undergo an arch intervention (OR = 4.5 (1.9, 19.8), p = 0.008). Incidence of arch intervention post-CSII was 16%. Echocardiographic arch velocities during the CSII hospitalization were the strongest predictors for subsequent aortic arch interventions. Further studies are needed to determine any modifiable variables that may reduce the incidence of arch interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:426 / 434
页数:8
相关论文
共 126 条
  • [1] Ohye RG(2010)Comparison of shunt types in the Norwood procedure for single-ventricle lesions N Engl J Med 362 1980-1992
  • [2] Sleeper LA(2020)Arch intervention following stage 1 palliation in hypoplastic left heart syndrome is associated with slower feed advancement: a report from the national pediatric quality cardiology improvement collaborative Cardiol Young 30 396-401
  • [3] Mahony L(2013)Recoarctation after the Norwood I procedure for hypoplastic left heart syndrome: incidence, risk factors, and treatment options Ann Thorac Surg 95 935-940
  • [4] Newburger JW(2019)Recoarctation after Norwood: time to rethink established strategies-but not for all cases Eur J Cardio-Thoracic Surg 56 1192-1193
  • [5] Pearson GD(2017)Recoarctation after Norwood I procedure for hypoplastic left heart syndrome: impact of patch material Ann Thoracic Surg 103 617-621
  • [6] Lu M(2017)Predicting the need for neoaortic arch intervention in infants with hypoplastic left heart syndrome through the Glenn procedure Pediatr Cardiol 38 70-76
  • [7] Chaves AH(2007)Hybrid transcatheter-surgical palliation: basis for univentricular or biventricular repair: the Giessen experience Pediatr Cardiol 28 79-87
  • [8] Baker-Smith CM(2008)Hybrid approach for hypoplastic left heart syndrome: intermediate results after the learning curve Ann Thoracic Surg 5 2063-2070
  • [9] Rosenthal GL(2018)Hybrid palliation: outcomes after the comprehensive stage 2 procedure Ann Thorac Surg 105 1455-1460
  • [10] Cleuziou J(2017)Geometry and growth of the reconstructed aorta in patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome and variants J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 153 1479-87 e1