Prognostic impact of Urokinase-type plasminogen activator system components in clear cell renal cell carcinoma patients without distant metastasis

被引:11
作者
Fuessel S. [1 ]
Erdmann K. [1 ]
Taubert H. [2 ]
Lohse-Fischer A. [1 ]
Zastrow S. [1 ]
Meinhardt M. [3 ]
Bluemke K. [4 ]
Hofbauer L. [5 ]
Fornara P. [6 ]
Wullich B. [2 ]
Baretton G. [3 ]
Magdolen V. [7 ]
Wirth M.P. [1 ]
Kotzsch M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Urology, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, Dresden
[2] Department of Urology, Universität Erlangen, Hartmannstrasse 14, Erlangen
[3] Institute of Pathology, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, Dresden
[4] Institute of Legal Medicine, Martin Luther Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Franzosenweg 1, Halle
[5] Department of Medicine III, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, Dresden
[6] Department of Urology, Martin Luther Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Ernst-Grube-Strasse 40, Halle
[7] Technische Universität München, Clinical Research Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ismaninger Strasse 22, München
关键词
PAI-1; Prognostic biomarker; Renal cell carcinoma; uPA; uPA system; uPAR;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2407-14-974
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Members of the urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) system including uPA, its receptor uPAR and the plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) play an important role in tumour invasion and progression in a variety of tumour types. Since the majority of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) shows distant metastasis at time of diagnosis or later, the interplay of uPA, uPAR and PAI-1 might be of importance in this process determining the patients' outcome. Methods: Corresponding pairs of malignant and non-malignant renal tissue specimens were obtained from 112 ccRCC patients without distant metastasis who underwent tumour nephrectomy. Tissue extracts prepared from fresh-frozen tissue samples by detergent extraction were used for the determination of antigen levels of uPA, uPAR and PAI-1 by ELISA. Antigen levels were normalised to protein concentrations and expressed as ng per mg of total protein. Results: Antigen levels of uPA, uPAR, and PAI-1 correlated with each other in the malignant tissue specimens (rs=0.51-0.65; all P<0.001). Antigen levels of uPA system components were significantly higher in tissue extracts of non-organ confined tumours (pT3+4) compared to organ-confined tumours (pT1+2; all P<0.05). Significantly elevated levels of uPAR and PAI-1 were also observed in high grade ccRCC. When using median antigen levels as cut-off points, all three uPA system factors were significant predictors for disease-specific survival (DSS) in univariate Cox's regression analyses. High levels of uPA and uPAR remained independent predictors for DSS with HR=2.86 (95% CI 1.07-7.67, P=0.037) and HR=4.70 (95% CI 1.51-14.6, P=0.008), respectively, in multivariate Cox's regression analyses. A combination of high antigen levels of uPA and/or uPAR further improved the prediction of DSS in multivariate analysis (HR=14.5, 95% CI 1.88-111.1, P=0.010). Moreover, high uPA and/or uPAR levels defined a patient subgroup of high risk for tumour-related death in ccRCC patients with organ-confined disease (pT1+2) (HR=9.83, 95% CI 1.21-79.6, P=0.032). Conclusions: High levels of uPA and uPAR in tumour tissue extracts are associated with a significantly shorter DSS of ccRCC patients without distant metastases. © 2014 Fuessel et al.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Ljungberg B., Campbell S.C., Choi H.Y., Jacqmin D., Lee J.E., Weikert S., Kiemeney L.A., The epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma, Eur Urol, 60, 4, pp. 615-621, (2011)
[2]  
Siegel R., DeSantis C., Virgo K., Stein K., Mariotto A., Smith T., Cooper D., Gansler T., Lerro C., Fedewa S., Lin C., Leach C., Cannady R.S., Cho H., Scoppa S., Hachey M., Kirch R., Jemal A., Ward E., Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2012, CA Cancer J Clin, 62, 4, pp. 220-241, (2012)
[3]  
Klatte T., Pantuck A.J., Kleid M.D., Belldegrun A.S., Understanding the natural biology of kidney cancer: implications for targeted cancer therapy, Rev Urol, 9, 2, pp. 47-56, (2007)
[4]  
Buchner A., Riesenberg R., Kotter I., Hofstetter A., Stief C., Oberneder R., Frequency and prognostic relevance of disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, Cancer, 106, 7, pp. 1514-1520, (2006)
[5]  
Di Lorenzo G., Autorino R., Sternberg C.N., Metastatic renal cell carcinoma: recent advances in the targeted therapy era, Eur Urol, 56, 6, pp. 959-971, (2009)
[6]  
Pinto A., Adjuvant therapy for renal cell carcinoma, Clin Genitourin Cancer, 12, pp. 408-412, (2014)
[7]  
Eichelberg C., Junker K., Ljungberg B., Moch H., Diagnostic and prognostic molecular markers for renal cell carcinoma: a critical appraisal of the current state of research and clinical applicability, Eur Urol, 55, 4, pp. 851-863, (2009)
[8]  
Finley D.S., Pantuck A.J., Belldegrun A.S., Tumor biology and prognostic factors in renal cell carcinoma, Oncologist, 16, pp. 4-13, (2011)
[9]  
Sun M., Shariat S.F., Cheng C., Ficarra V., Murai M., Oudard S., Pantuck A.J., Zigeuner R., Karakiewicz P.I., Prognostic factors and predictive models in renal cell carcinoma: a contemporary review, Eur Urol, 60, 4, pp. 644-661, (2011)
[10]  
McMahon B., Kwaan H.C., The plasminogen activator system and cancer, Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb, 36, 3-4, pp. 184-194, (2008)