Research on carbon emission efficiency in the Chinese construction industry based on a three-stage DEA-Tobit model

被引:0
作者
Mengna Zhang
Lianshui Li
Zhonghua Cheng
机构
[1] Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology,School of Business
[2] Nanjing University of Information Science &Technology,China Institute of Manufacturing Development
[3] Nanjing University of Information Science &Technology,School of Management Science and Engineering
来源
Environmental Science and Pollution Research | 2021年 / 28卷
关键词
Construction industry; External environmental factors; Three-stage DEA; Carbon emission efficiency; Internal influencing factors; China;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The traditional data envelopment analysis (DEA) model usually ignores the influence of external environmental factors and random interference. This can easily lead to deviations in efficiency estimates. In order to solve this problem, a three-stage DEA model was used to better reflect the carbon emission efficiency of Chinese construction industry (CEECI) (2006–2017) from the perspective of non-management factors. The internal influencing factors of CEECI are analyzed by the Tobit model, which provides a more accurate basis for formulating policies. It is found that the CEECI is significantly affected by the GDP, the level of industrialization, the degree of opening-up, technological innovation, and energy structure. After excluding environmental factors and random interference, the average CEECI increased by 16%. The resulting calculations are noteworthy in three aspects. First, there are significant regional differences in the CEECI. Both the multi-polarization phenomenon of CEECI and regional differences also reduced gradually over time. Second, the CEECI can be decomposed into pure carbon emission efficiency (PCEE) and scale efficiency (SE), which is mainly caused by SE. Excluding external environmental factors and random interference will have a specific impact on the CEECI. All the 30 provinces are divided into four categories to analyze the reasons and solutions of the differences in the CEECI in provinces. Third, many factors had inhibitory effects on the CEECI, PCEE, and SE; these included energy structure optimization, labor force number, total power of construct ion equipment, and construction intensity in the construction industry. Nevertheless, the development level of the construction industry did have a significant positive effect.
引用
收藏
页码:51120 / 51136
页数:16
相关论文
共 128 条
[1]  
Banker RD(1984)Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis Manag Sci 30 1078-1092
[2]  
Charnes A(2019)Benchmarking carbon emissions efficiency in Chinese cities: a comparative study based on high-resolution gridded data Appl Energy 242 994-1009
[3]  
Cooper W(2016)The energy efficiency of China's regional construction industry based on the three-stage DEA model and the DEA-DA model KSCE J Civ Eng 20 34-47
[4]  
Cai B(2018)Total-factor carbon emission efficiency of China's provincial industrial sector and its dynamic evolution Renew Sust Energ Rev 94 330-339
[5]  
Guo H(2018)Industrial structure, technical progress and carbon intensity in China's provinces Renew Sust Energ Rev 81 2935-2946
[6]  
Ma Z(2020)Efficiency assessment of rural domestic sewage treatment facilities by a slacked-based DEA model J Clean Prod 267 122111-11
[7]  
Wang Z(2014)The evaluation of transportation energy efficiency: an application of three-stage virtual frontier DEA Transport Res Part D-Transport Environ 29 1-530
[8]  
Dhakal S(2019)Regional carbon emission efficiency and its dynamic evolution in China: a novel cross efficiency-Malmquist productivity index J Clean Prod 241 118260-889
[9]  
Cao L(2013)Regional carbon emission performance in China according to a stochastic frontier model Renew Sust Energ Rev 28 525-174
[10]  
Chen Y(2018)Combined carbon and energy intensity benchmarks for sustainable retail stores Energy 165 877-3217