Development and Evaluation of a Swedish Short Version of the Questionnaire About the Process of Recovery (QPR)

被引:0
作者
Eklund Mona
Neil Sandra
Argentzell Elisabeth
机构
[1] Lund University,Department of Health Sciences, Mental Health, Activity and Participation (MAP)
[2] Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust,Department of Clinical Psychology, Cromwell House Community Mental Health Team
来源
Community Mental Health Journal | 2020年 / 56卷
关键词
Assessment; Psychometrics; Mental illness; Recovery; Validity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim was to develop a short version of the Swedish Process of Recovery Questionnaire (QPR-Swe) for use with people with severe mental illness and to investigate its internal consistency, construct validity, known-groups validity and any floor or ceiling effects. Two independent samples were used, the first (N = 226) to develop the short version and the second (N = 266) to test its psychometric properties. A seven-item version was developed by selecting items based on item-total correlations. The QPR-Swe-7 showed good internal consistency reliability (α = 0.82). It showed moderate correlations with indicators of convergent validity (self-rated health, self-mastery and quality of life) and weak with those selected to test discriminant validity (psychiatric symptoms and level of functioning). QPR-Swe-7 differentiated between people receiving two different levels of housing support. No floor or ceiling effects were found. The QPR-Swe-7 had appropriate psychometric properties for use with people with a variety of mental disorders when a brief scale is warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:376 / 382
页数:6
相关论文
共 110 条
[1]  
Anthony W(1993)Recovery from mental illness: The guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal 16 11-23
[2]  
Argentzell E(2017)Measuring personal recovery—Psychometric properties of the Swedish Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR-Swe) Nordic Journal of Psychiatry 71 529-535
[3]  
Hultqvist J(2005)Quality of life in people with severe mental illness. Reliability and validity of the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA) Nordic Journal of Psychiatry 59 302-306
[4]  
Neil S(2005)Just one question: If one question works, why ask several? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 59 342-345
[5]  
Eklund M(2014)Assessing the validity of single-item life satisfaction measures: Results from three large samples Quality of Life Research 23 2809-2818
[6]  
Björkman T(2011)Selecting outcome measures in mental health: The views of service users Journal of Mental Health 20 336-346
[7]  
Svensson B(2016)The recovery movement: Implications for mental health care and enabling people to participate fully in life Health Affairs (Millwood) 35 1091-1097
[8]  
Bowling A(2016)Perception of occupational balance by people with mental illness: A new methodology Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 23 304-313
[9]  
Cheung F(2012)Psychometric properties of a Swedish version of the Pearlin Mastery Scale in people with mental illness and healthy people Nordic Journal of Psychiatry 66 380-388
[10]  
Lucas RE(2012)The life situation of people with persistent mental illness visiting day centers: A comparative study Community Mental Health Journal 48 592-597