Isolation and Selection of Potential Probiotic Bacteria from the Pig Gastrointestinal Tract

被引:0
作者
Luca Lo Verso
Martin Lessard
Guylaine Talbot
Benoit Fernandez
Ismail Fliss
机构
[1] Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada,Sherbrooke Research and Development Centre
[2] Université Laval,Institute of Nutrition and Functional Foods
来源
Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins | 2018年 / 10卷
关键词
Porcine gastrointestinal tract; Probiotic; Antagonistic activity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The present study aimed to isolate bacterial strains from the pig gastrointestinal tract that have antagonistic activity against potential pathogens and are able to produce antimicrobial compounds. That ability would be a first requirement for the strains’ possible use as probiotics. Samples obtained from pig intestinal mucosa and contents were screened for the presence of antagonistic activity against pathogenic indicator strains of Escherichia coli, Salmonella, and Listeria by means of the double-layer technique. Samples displaying the largest inhibitory halos were further studied for the production of inhibitory substances using the agar diffusion and microtitration methods. The three most promising isolates were identified by sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene and showed highest affiliation to Lactobacillus salivarius. Optimal growth conditions and bacteriocin production were recorded in de Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe broth under anaerobic conditions at 37 °C. The antimicrobial substances were found to be sensitive to proteolytic enzymes but showed good stability at pH values below 6. Our findings suggest that these three intestinal strains are able to produce antimicrobial substances capable of inhibiting the growth of potential enteric pathogens and might have potential as probiotic feed additives for the prevention of gastrointestinal diseases.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 312
页数:13
相关论文
共 259 条
[1]  
Fuller R(1989)Probiotics in man and animals J Appl Bacteriol 66 365-378
[2]  
Gusils C(2002)Preliminary studies to design a probiotic foruse in swine feed Interciencia 27 409-413
[3]  
Bujazha M(2007)The novel porcine lactobacillus sobrius strain protects intestinal cells from Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88 infection and prevents membrane barrier damage J Nutr 137 2709-2716
[4]  
González S(2002)The bacteriocins of ruminal bacteria and their potential as an alternative to antibiotics J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 4 347-355
[5]  
Roselli M(2003)Isolation, selection, and characterization of lactic acid bacteria for a competitive exclusion product to reduce shedding of <i>Escherichia coli</i> O157:H7 in cattle J Food Prot 66 355-363
[6]  
Finamore A(2010)Probiotics and prebiotics in animal feeding for safe food production Int J Food Microbiol 141 S15-S28
[7]  
Britti MS(2007)Applications of bacteriocins in livestock Curr Issues Intest Microbiol 8 15-23
[8]  
Konstantinov SR(2009)Administration of Pediococcus acidilactici or Saccharomyces cerevisiae boulardii modulates development of porcine mucosal immunity and reduces intestinal bacterial translocation after Escherichia coli challenge J Anim Sci 87 922-934
[9]  
Smidt H(2011)Administration of probiotics influences F4 (K88)-positive enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli attachment and intestinal cytokine expression in weaned pigs Vet Res 42 69-215
[10]  
de Vos WM(2000)Probiotic bacteria: safety, functional and technological properties J Biotechnol 84 197-85