The value of a CT scan compared to plain radiographs for the classification and treatment plan in tibial plateau fractures

被引:36
作者
Te Stroet M.A.J. [1 ]
Holla M. [1 ]
Biert J. [1 ]
Van Kampen A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Nijmegen Medical Centre, Radboud University, 6501 HB, Nijmegen
关键词
CT scan; Plain radiographs; Schatzker classification; Tibial plateau fracture; Treatment plan;
D O I
10.1007/s10140-010-0932-5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study aimed to evaluate the intra- and interobserver agreement for both fracture classification according to Schatzker and treatment plan of tibial plateau fractures using plain radiographs alone and with computed tomography (CT) scans. The study was carried out prospectively to assess the impact of an advanced radiographic study on the agreement of treatment plan and fracture classification of tibial plateau fractures. Eight experienced observers (six surgeons and two radiologists) classified 15 tibial plateau fractures with plain radiographs and CT scans and set up a treatment plan. Agreement was measured using kappa coefficients. Using plain radiographs alone, the mean interobserver kappa coefficient for classification was 0.47, which decreased to 0.46 after addition of CT scans. Using plain films alone for formulating a treatment plan, the mean interobserver kappa coefficient was 0.40, which decreased to 0.30 after addition of CT scans. The mean intraobserver kappa coefficient for fracture classification using plain radiographs was 0.60, which decreased to 0.57 with addition of CT scans. The mean intraobserver kappa coefficient for treatment plan based on plain radiographs alone was 0.53, which decreased to 0.45 after addition of CT scans. In contrast with other recent publications, there is no increase in inter- and intraagreement of a CT scan compared to plain radiographs for the classification and treatment plan in tibial plateau fractures. Routine CT scanning of the knee for tibial plateau fractures is not supported by this study. © The Author(s) 2011.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 283
页数:4
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Tscherne H., Lobenhoffer P., Tibial plateau fractures: Management and expected results, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 292, pp. 87-100, (1993)
[2]  
Brunner A., Horisberger M., Ulmar B., Et al., Classification systems for tibial plateau fractures
[3]  
does computed tomography scanning improve their reliability?, Injury, 41, 2, pp. 173-178, (2010)
[4]  
Chan P.S.H., Klimkiewicz J.J., Luchetti W.T., Esterhai J.L., Bruce Kneeland J., Dalinka M.K., Bruce Heppenstall R., Impact of CT scan on treatment plan and fracture classification of tibial plateau fractures, Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 11, 7, pp. 484-489, (1997)
[5]  
Yacoubian S.V., Nevins R.T., Sallis J.G., Potter H.G., Lorich D.G., Impact of MRI on treatment plan and fracture classification of tibial plateau fractures, Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 16, 9, pp. 632-637, (2002)
[6]  
Radiation dose in computed tomography
[7]  
why it's a concern and what you can do about it, Health Devices, 36, 2, pp. 41-63, (2007)
[8]  
Hall E.J., Brenner D.J., Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology, British Journal of Radiology, 81, 965, pp. 362-378, (2008)
[9]  
Schatzker J., McBroom R., The tibial plateau fracture. The Toronto experience 1968-1975, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, NO. 138, pp. 94-104, (1979)
[10]  
Papagelopoulos P.J., Partsinevelos A.A., Themistocleous G.S., Mavrogenis A.F., Korres D.S., Soucacos P.N., Complications after tibia plateau fracture surgery, Injury, 37, 6, pp. 475-484, (2006)