Transforming mathematics classroom practice through participatory action research

被引:0
作者
Pete Wright
机构
[1] UCL Institute of Education,
来源
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education | 2021年 / 24卷
关键词
Critical mathematics education; Equity; Social justice; Empowerment; Participatory action research;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper explores the potential of participatory action research to bring about significant changes in practice in a context in which more conventional approaches to research have had limited impact. It focuses on secondary mathematics classrooms where teaching approaches characterised by memorising and practising mathematical procedures, with little understanding of their application, purpose or underlying concepts, remain commonplace in many countries around the world and have proved highly resistant to change. The paper highlights the damage caused by such practices in terms of the alienation of large numbers of students and the inequitable outcomes they are associated with, including the strong correlation that persists between students’ socio-economic status and mathematical attainment. It reports on the case of one participatory action research project, involving the author and five teacher researchers, that demonstrated how a vision of mathematics education, involving a genuinely engaging and empowering curriculum, can be translated into classroom practice. The paper considers the extent to which this research project was conducted in a collaborative, systematic and rigorous way. It reflects on the research processes that facilitated critical reflection, enabled the teacher researchers to overcome constraints and generated trustworthy findings. The insights gained from this analysis are used to argue that a participatory action research methodology, which resonates with a critical mathematics pedagogy, has the potential to challenge prevailing discourses in mathematics education and hence lead to genuine transformations in classroom practice.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 177
页数:22
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
Barrett B(2017)Bernstein in the urban classroom: A case study British Journal of Sociology of Education 34 167-194
[2]  
Boaler J(2008)Promoting ‘relational equity’ and high mathematics achievement through an innovative mixed-ability approach British Educational Research Journal 37 457-484
[3]  
Boaler J(2011)Mathematics and science inequalities in the United Kingdom: When elitism, sexism and culture collide Oxford Review of Education 1 9-28
[4]  
Altendorf L(2003)Why action research? Action Research 16 79-93
[5]  
Kent G(2009)Participatory action research: Contributions to the development of practitioner inquiry in education Educational Action Research 44 5-10
[6]  
Brydon-Miller M(2013)Introduction to the JRME Equity special issue Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 24 565-585
[7]  
Greenwood D(2013)Resisting reductionism in mathematics pedagogy The Curriculum Journal 47 1-17
[8]  
Maguire P(2017)Exploring the relative lack of impact of research on ‘ability grouping’ in England: A discourse analytic account Cambridge Journal of Education 12 161-170
[9]  
Brydon-Miller M(2009)Foregrounding social justice in mathematics teacher education Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 19 457-475
[10]  
Maguire P(2016)Video-stimulated recall as a catalyst for teacher professional learning Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 21 321-342