Gender differences in glenoid anatomy: an anatomic study

被引:0
作者
Andrea Merrill
Kara Guzman
Suzanne L. Miller
机构
[1] New England Baptist Hospital,
来源
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy | 2009年 / 31卷
关键词
Glenoid; Shoulder joint; Shoulder joint/anatomy and histology; Gender differences; Anthropometry;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Gender differences in glenoid anatomy have not been well studied in the current literature. Previous literature demonstrates a mismatch between glenoid anatomy and glenoid implants for shoulder replacements. This may have clinical implications in that glenoid loosening after shoulder arthroplasty has been cited as a frequent cause of poor performance of shoulder implants, and perhaps the most common indication for revision. The purpose of this study was to determine any gender differences in the size and overall shape of the glenoid. Eleven measurements were taken of 363 human scapular bone specimens (equal proportions of females to males and blacks to whites). Glenoid height and width, glenoid notch location, and depth were measured for each specimen using calipers. In addition, the authors developed a classification system to describe anterior glenoid notch morphology. There was a significant difference between female and male specimens for each dimension measured (P < 0.05). Height to width ratios were also significantly different comparing men to women (P < 0.05). These differences resulted in a rounder male glenoid and more oval female glenoid. Our results showed that 80.4% of females had an anterior glenoid notch compared to only 57.6% of males. There was a significant difference between female and male specimens in the location of the anterior glenoid notch: 36.7% from the top of the glenoid in female specimens, and 28.9% in males (P < 0.0001). The clear difference between male and female glenoid anatomy may be important in various shoulder surgeries.
引用
收藏
页码:183 / 189
页数:6
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Bicknell RT(2007)Glenoid vault endosteal dimensions: an anthropometric study with special interest in implant design J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16 96S-101S
  • [2] Patterson S(2002)Fit of current glenoid component designs: an anatomic cadaver study J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11 614-617
  • [3] King G(2001)Glenoid size, inclination, and version: an anatomic study J Shoulder Elbow Surg 10 327-332
  • [4] Chess D(1994)Modular total shoulder replacement Clin Orthop Rel Res 307 37-46
  • [5] Johnson J(1988)Glenoid loosening in total shoulder arthroplasty J Arthroplasty 3 39-46
  • [6] Checroun AJ(1999)Treatment of symptomatic glenoid loosening following unconstrained shoulder arthroplasty Orthopedics 22 229-234
  • [7] Hawkins C(1992)The normal glenohumeral relationships: an anatomical study of one hundred and forty shoulders J Bone Joint Surg Am 74 491-500
  • [8] Kummer FJ(1982)Revision of humeral head and total shoulder arthroplasties Clin Orthop Rel Res 170 189-195
  • [9] Zuckerman JD(1997)The glenoid notch and its relation to the shape of the glenoid cavity of the scapula J Anat 190 457-460
  • [10] Churchill RS(1998)Neer hemiarthroplasty and Neer total shoulder arthroplasty in patients fifty years old or less J Bone Joint Surg Am 80 464-473