Determinants of Intellectual Property Rights Protection in Asian Developing Countries

被引:0
作者
Ha Thi-Thu Le
Trang Thi-Dai Luong
Trang Thi Thu Nguyen
Duy Van Nguyen
机构
[1] Foreign Trade University,FTU Innovation and Incubation Space
[2] Faculty of Economics and Business,undefined
[3] Phenikaa University,undefined
来源
Journal of the Knowledge Economy | 2023年 / 14卷
关键词
Intellectual property rights protection; Panel data; Asian developing countries; Patent law; F42; K42; O34; O38; O57 ;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In the knowledge economy, intangible assets and intellectual property rights are increasingly recognized as a substance of competencies. As an emerging market of the world, Asian developing countries experience various issues related to intellectual property rights protection. Meanwhile, the current literature on intellectual property rights with an emphasis placed on Asia is quite scarce. Therefore, this study explores the determinants of the strength of intellectual property rights in 25 Asian developing countries during the 11-year period from 2006 to 2016. Using the fixed effects model (FEM) and random effects model (REM) with the Hausman test, the paper discovers the positive impacts of economic growth, trade openness, and WTO participation on the protection level of intellectual property rights. Unexpectedly, education is a negative determinant of intellectual property rights protection. This study aims to demonstrate the overall status quos of intellectual property rights regimes across Asian developing countries, so provide an important theoretical background for innovators, governments, and policymakers to design optimal intellectual property rights strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:4780 / 4806
页数:26
相关论文
共 151 条
[1]  
Aboites J(2002)Intellectual property rights and national innovation systems-Some lessons from the Mexican experience Revue D’économie Industrielle 99 215-232
[2]  
Cimoli M(2012)Introduction to economic growth Journal of Economic Theory 147 545-550
[3]  
Acemoglu D(2013)Towards the (strategic) management of intellectual property: Retrospective and prospective California Management Review 55 15-30
[4]  
Al-Aali AY(2016)The effect of patent enforcement strength and FDI on economic growth Multinational Business Review 24 334-353
[5]  
Teece DJ(1994)How theory does-and does not-matter: American approaches to intellectual property law in East Asia UCLA Pac. Basin LJ 13 8-377
[6]  
Alexiou C(2017)Intellectual property rights and cross-border mergers and acquisitions Journal of Corporate Finance 45 360-203
[7]  
Nellis J(1997)Guilty in whose eyes? University students’ perceptions of cheating and plagiarism in academic work and assessment Studies in Higher Education 22 187-703
[8]  
Papageorgiadis N(2012)Fighting software piracy in Africa: How do legal origins and IPRs protection channels matter? Journal of Knowledge Economy 6 682-1308
[9]  
Alford WP(2020)Global software piracy, technology and property rights institutions Journal of Knowledge Economy 9 1291-284
[10]  
Alimov A(2018)Determinants of property rights protection in Sub-Saharan Africa Journal of the Knowledge Economy 17 281-443