Modelling pesticides transfer to surface water at the catchment scale: a multi-criteria analysis

被引:0
作者
Sylvain Payraudeau
Caroline Gregoire
机构
[1] University of Strasbourg/ENGEES,Laboratory of Hydrology and Geochemistry of Strasbourg (LHyGeS)
[2] CNRS,undefined
来源
Agronomy for Sustainable Development | 2012年 / 32卷
关键词
Pesticides; Surface water; Hydrological connectivity; Processes; Models; Catchment; Watershed; Review; Evaluation; Uncertainty;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The demand for operational tools at a catchment scale is growing to assess both the sustainability of agricultural practices and the efficiency of mitigation measures on pesticide transfer to surface water. Here a literature review of 286 investigations highlights the large number of indicators and hydrochemical models developed at the catchment scale. Given this large number of indicators and models, the choice is difficult for potential users. Therefore, this article proposes a multi-criteria analysis applied to ten existing tools including physically based and conceptual models, indicators and multi-agent systems. We found the following major points: (1) Indicators and conceptual models are the most popular approaches to assess the transfer of pesticides to surface water at the catchment scale due to a trade-off between environmental relevance and adaptation to user’s needs. (2) The latest indicators developed are inferred from the results of conceptual or physically based models to combine the strengths of each approach. (3) Only a handful of physically based models have addressed both flow and pesticide transport at the catchment as affected by the internal heterogeneity of the system. However, it is only physically based models that can simulate the impact of changes to the catchment. Physically based models integrate feedbacks between hydrological and chemical processes not possible from conceptual models or indicators alone. (4) The ability of models to assess the pesticide loads both in the dissolved and particulate phases is a key issue not properly addressed by many indicators or models. A key way forward is the integration of erosion processes with the fate of pesticide adsorbed to these particles. (5) At the catchment, the hydrological connectivity is perhaps the primary hydrological variable required to correctly assess rapid flow processes as surface runoff and associated pesticide transfer. This in turn implies using tools that explicitly represent the connectedness of surface and/or sub-surface water pathways including mitigation measures to correctly assess the risk of pesticide transfer.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 500
页数:21
相关论文
共 402 条
[1]  
Alletto L(2010)Tillage management effects on pesticide fate in soils. A review Agron Sustain Dev 30 367-400
[2]  
Coquet Y(2004)Variable “active” versus “contributing” areas or periods: a necessary distinction. HP-Today Invited Commentary Hydrol Process 18 1149-1155
[3]  
Benoit P(2004)Determination of pesticides and their degradation products in soil: critical review and comparison of methods TrAC Trends Anal Chem 23 772-789
[4]  
Heddadj J(2007)Probabilistic approach for analysis of uncertainty in the evaluation of watershed management practices J Hydrol 333 459-471
[5]  
Barriuso E(2008)The mobility and degradation of pesticides in soils and the pollution of groundwater resources Agr Ecosyst Environ 123 247-260
[6]  
Ambroise B(2009)A plot drainage network as a conceptual tool for the spatial representation of surface flow pathways in agricultural catchments Comput geosci 35 276-288
[7]  
Andreu V(2008)The effect of crop rotation on pesticide leaching in a regional pesticide risk assessment Environ Sci Technol 42 8000-8006
[8]  
Picó Y(2006)Measurement of trifluralin volatilization in the field: relation to soil residue and effect of soil incorporation Environ Pollut 144 958-966
[9]  
Arabi M(2002)Rate of pesticide volatilization from soil: an experimental approach with a wind tunnel system applied to trifluralin Atmos Environ 36 5917-5925
[10]  
Govindaraju RS(1992)The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction Hydrol Process 6 279-298