Effective Treatment of Acute Otitis Externa: a Comparison of Steroid Antibiotic Versus 10% Ichthammol Glycerine Pack

被引:0
作者
B. L. Shrestha
I. Shrestha
R. C. M. Amatya
A. Dhakal
机构
[1] Kathmandu university School of Medical Sciences,Department of ENT
来源
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery | 2010年 / 62卷
关键词
Acute otitis externa; Numeric rating scale; Steroid–antibiotic pack; 10% Ichthammol glycerine pack;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To compare the efficacy of treatment between steroid–antibiotic and 10% Ichthammol glycerine packs (IG packs) in acute otitis externa. A prospective, randomized clinical trial between steroid–antibiotic and 10% IG pack which was performed in department of ENT-HNS, Kathmandu University Hospital, Dhulikhel from July 2009 to December 2009 on 82 patients. Pain was assessed by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and edema was assessed by dividing the external auditory canal in four quadrant giving score of 25% for each on the day of presentation and subsequent visits till tragal tenderness and edema subsided. Age group among studied patients ranged from 10 to 60 years, with mean of 23.5 years. Out of which 42 (51.2%) were females and 40 (48.8%) were males. Average number of visits in 10% IG pack group (n = 41) was 5.4 days (2–5 visits) while in steroid–antibiotic group (n = 41) it was 3.5 days (2–5 visits). There was statistically significant decrease in the number of visits in steroid group (P < 0.05). Similarly, decrease in pain score in second visit was statistically significant (P = 0.02) in steroid–antibiotic group as compared to 10% IG pack, while the edema score in second visit while comparing steroid–antibiotic group with 10% IG pack was statistically not significant (P = 0.07), whereas it was statistically highly significant on fourth visit (P = 0.001). Since the control of pain and edema is more and hence the number of visits is significantly less in steroid–antibiotic packing group, so it is worthwhile to use steroid–antibiotic pack for effective treatment of acute otitis externa.
引用
收藏
页码:350 / 353
页数:3
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
Sundstrom J(1996) in otitis externa. A particular variety of the bacteria? Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 122 833-836
[2]  
Jacobson K(1995)Antimicrobial activity of glycerine–ichthammol in otitis externa Clin otolaryngol Allied Sci 20 201-203
[3]  
Munck-Wikland E(1996)Glycerol and ichthammol:medicinal solution or mythical potion? J Laryngol and Otol 110 319-321
[4]  
Ringertz S(2007)A comparison of ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone with neomycin/polymyxin/hydrocortisone for otitis externa pain Adv Ther 24 671-675
[5]  
Ahmed K(2003)Clinical efficacy of three common treatments in acute otitis externa in primary care: randomised controlled trial BMJ 327 1201-1205
[6]  
Roberts ML(2004)Ear drops containing steroids were better than acetic acid for otitis externa Evid Based Nurs 7 43-S48
[7]  
Mannion PT(2006)Systematic review of topical antimicrobial therapy for acute otitis externa Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 134 S24-419
[8]  
Nilssen E(2002)Randomized trial on the treatment of oedematous acute otitis externa using ear wicks or ribbon gauze: clinical outcome and cost J Laryngol Otol 116 415-3542
[9]  
Wormald PJ(2008)Comparison of efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin otic solution 0.2% versus polymyxin B-neomycin-hydrocortisone in the treatment of acute diffuse otitis externa Curr Med Res Opin 24 3531-45
[10]  
Oliver S(2009)A double-blind randomised clinical trial of the treatment of otitis externa using topical steroid alone versus topical steroid–antibiotic therapy Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 266 41-1094