Review of methods for sustainability appraisals in ship acquisition

被引：9
作者：
Aspen D.M. [1 ]
Sparrevik M. [1 ]
Fet A.M. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Department of Industrial Economics and Technology Management, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim
来源：
Environment Systems and Decisions | 2015年 / 35卷 / 3期
关键词：
Design; MCDM; Method selection; Multi-criteria decision making; Ship acquisition; Sustainability appraisal;
D O I：
10.1007/s10669-015-9561-6
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Ship acquisition requires simultaneous consideration of environmental, economic, technological and social performance of candidate design solutions. During the last few decades, multi-criteria decision-making tools have gained popularity as an approach to assisting decision makers when appraising ship design. However, applications are limited to a few methods mostly within the value function class. In this review, we explore the applicability of 12 multi-criteria decision-making methods for typical decision contexts in ship acquisition. Technical and practical method properties are defined before their operational value for evaluations in ship acquisition is assessed. Our results show that a wide range of methods currently not applied offer promising properties in these contexts. © 2015, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码：323 / 333
页数：10
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Andrews D., Papanikolaou A., Erichsen S., Vasudevan S., State of the art report on design methodology, Paper presented at the 10th International Marine Design Conference, (2009)
[2]  
Barone M., Begovic E., Bertorello C., Stella M., Preference communication in multiattribute procedures for optimised ship design. Paper presented at the 12th International Congress of the International Maritime Association of the Mediterranean, IMAM 2005 - Maritime Transportation and Exploitation of Ocean and Coastal Resources, Lisboa, (2005)
[3]  
Belton V., Stewart T.J., Multiple criteria decision analysis: an integrated approach, (2002)
[4]  
Brans J.-P., Mareschal B., Promethee methods, In: Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys, 78, pp. 163-186, (2005)
[5]  
Brans J.P., Vincke P., A preference ranking organisation method (The PROMETHEE method for multiple criteria decision-making), Manage Sci, 31, pp. 647-656, (1985)
[6]  
Bulut E., Yoshida S., Duru O., (2010) Cognitive model of dry bulk carrier investment decision by utilizing analytic hierarchy process. Paper presented at the 8th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics, (2010)
[7]  
Bulut E., Duru O., Kececi T., Yoshida S., Use of consistency index, expert prioritization and direct numerical inputs for generic fuzzy-AHP modeling: a process model for shipping asset management, Expert Syst Appl, 39, pp. 1911-1923, (2012)
[8]  
Coyne R.D., Knowledge-based design systems, (1990)
[9]  
De Cushing C.R., The ship acquisition process, Ship design and construction, (2003)
[10]  
De Montis A., De Toro P., Droste-Franke B., Omann I., Stagl S., Assessing the quality of different MCDA methods, Alternatives for environmental valuation, pp. 99-133, (2005)
123456