Emergency and weekend robotic surgery are feasible

被引:13
作者
Sudan R. [1 ]
Desai S.S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
关键词
Abdominal surgery; Bariatric surgery; Biliopancreatic diversion; Da Vinci; Duodenal switch; Minimally invasive surgery (MIS); Robot-assisted;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-011-0289-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Robotic surgery has made a minimally invasive approach feasible for many complex operations that were previously performed by the open approach. Because of the complexity of its technology and the need for specially trained personnel, robotic operations have been limited to elective cases during weekdays. As more surgeons from different specialties perform robotic operations, the chances of scheduling conflicts and the possibility of complications needing a re-operation at night or during a weekend (defined as after hours) are also increasing. Until now, complications have been salvaged by conventional laparoscopy or laparotomy but we were able to demonstrate that, with appropriately trained staff, robotic surgery is feasible after hours and in emergencies. Use of the robot after hours could help alleviate scheduling conflicts for the operating room. For patients, it could potentially avoid laparotomy with its associated morbidity. As far as we are aware, use of the robot for emergency surgery has previously not been reported in the literature. © 2011 Springer-Verlag London Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 266
页数:3
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Orvieto M.A., Patel V.R., Evolution of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, Scand J Surg, 98, 2, pp. 76-88, (2009)
[2]  
Wilson E.B., The evolution of robotic general surgery, Scand J Surg, 98, 2, pp. 125-129, (2009)
[3]  
Talamini M.A., Surgery of the 21st century, Ann Surg, 234, 1, pp. 8-9, (2001)
[4]  
Kwak J.M., Kim S.H., Kim J., Son D.N., Baek S.J., Cho J.S., Robotic versus laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcomes of a case-control study, Dis Colon Rectum, 54, 2, pp. 151-156, (2011)
[5]  
Lim P.C., Kang E., do Park H., A comparative detail analysis of the learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy versus laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in treatment of endometrial cancer: a case-matched controlled study of the first one hundred twenty two patients, Gynecol Oncol, 120, 3, pp. 413-418, (2011)
[6]  
Markar S.R., Karthikesalingam A.P., Hagen M.E., Talamini M., Horgan S., Wagner O.J., Robotic versus laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: systematic review and meta-analysis, Int J Med Robot, 6, 2, pp. 125-131, (2010)
[7]  
Lehr E.J., Rodriguez E., Chitwood W.R., Robotic cardiac surgery, Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, 24, 1, pp. 77-85, (2011)
[8]  
Ballantyne G.H., Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Review of early clinical results, Surg Endosc, 16, 10, pp. 1389-1402, (2002)
[9]  
Buchwald H., Avidor Y., Braunwald E., Et al., Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Jama, 292, 14, pp. 1724-1737, (2004)
[10]  
Kim W.W., Gagner M., Kini S., Et al., Laparoscopic vs. open biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: a comparative study, J Gastrointest Surg, 7, 4, pp. 552-557, (2003)