Does computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty improve patient outcome at midterm follow-up?

被引：0
作者：
Yogeesh D. Kamat
Kamran M. Aurakzai
Ajeya R. Adhikari
Daniel Matthews
Yegappan Kalairajah
Richard E. Field
机构：
[1] Epsom and St. Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust,The South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre
来源：
International Orthopaedics | 2009年 / 33卷
关键词：
Total Knee Arthroplasty; Mechanical Axis; Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty; Oxford Knee Score; Computer Navigation;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Computer navigation assistance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) results in consistently accurate alignment of prostheses. We aimed to compare the outcome of computer-navigated and conventional TKA and to analyse the radiologically malaligned knees. We analysed 637 primary TKA, carried out by a single surgeon, over five consecutive years and divided them into two cohorts: group 1 = STA (standard instrumentation) and group 2  = CAS (computer-assisted surgery). There was no significant difference between the average Oxford Knee Scores (OKS) of the two groups at any time from one to five years. However, the malaligned TKA at three years had a worse OKS. At medium term there is no difference in clinical outcome measures that can be attributed to the surgeon having used computer-assisted navigation for TKA. But group 1, having a higher proportion of malaligned TKA, might show worsening of OKS at long term.
引用
收藏
页码：1567 / 1570
页数：3
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Bäthis H(2004)Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique J Bone Joint Surg Br 86 682-687
[2]  
Perlick L(2007)Experiences with computer navigated total knee arthroplasty Int Orthop 31 617-622
[3]  
Tingart M(2005)Computer navigation versus standard instrumentation for TKA: a single-surgeon experience Clin Orthop Relat Res 440 162-169
[4]  
Bejek Z(2004)Computer-assisted total knee replacement. A controlled cadaver study using a multi-parameter quantitative CT assessment of alignment (the Perth CT Protocol) J Bone Joint Surg Br 86 818-823
[5]  
Sólyom L(2002)Rating systems for total knee replacement Knee 9 261-266
[6]  
Szendrõi M(1998)Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement J Bone Joint Surg Br 80 63-69
[7]  
Bolognesi M(2001)Appropriate questionnaires for knee arthroplasty. Results of a survey of 3600 patients from The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83 339-344
[8]  
Hofmann A(2006)When computer-assisted knee replacement is the best alternative Clin Orthop Relat Res 452 132-136
[9]  
Chauhan S(2005)The Oxford hip scores for primary and revision hip replacement J Bone Joint Surg Br 87 618-622
[10]  
Clark G(2005)Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty Clin Orthop Relat Res 433 152-159
123456