Comparative analysis of grapevine whole-genome gene predictions, functional annotation, categorization and integration of the predicted gene sequences

被引：130
作者：
Jérôme Grimplet
John Van Hemert
Pablo Carbonell-Bejerano
José Díaz-Riquelme
Julie Dickerson
Anne Fennell
Mario Pezzotti
José M Martínez-Zapater
机构：
[1] Instituto de Ciencias de la Vid y Del Vino (CSIC, Universidad de la Rioja, Gobierno de la Rioja), CCT, Logrõo, Espãa, 26006
[2] Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Department, Iowa State University, Ames
[3] Departamento de Genética Molecular de Plantas, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología, (CNB-CSIC), Madrid, 28049
[4] Plant Science Department, South Dakota State University, Brookings
[5] Department of Biotechnology, University of Verona, Verona, 37134
来源：
BMC Research Notes | / 5卷 / 1期
关键词：
Functional Annotation; Gene Prediction; Pinot Noir; Grapevine Genome; Grapevine Gene;
D O I：
10.1186/1756-0500-5-213
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Background: The first draft assembly and gene prediction of the grapevine genome (8X base coverage) was made available to the scientific community in 2007, and functional annotation was developed on this gene prediction. Since then additional Sanger sequences were added to the 8X sequences pool and a new version of the genomic sequence with superior base coverage (12X) was produced. Results: In order to more efficiently annotate the function of the genes predicted in the new assembly, it is important to build on as much of the previous work as possible, by transferring 8X annotation of the genome to the 12X version. The 8X and 12X assemblies and gene predictions of the grapevine genome were compared to answer the question, Can we uniquely map 8X predicted genes to 12X predicted genes? The results show that while the assemblies and gene structure predictions are too different to make a complete mapping between them, most genes (18,725) showed a one-to-one relationship between 8X predicted genes and the last version of 12X predicted genes. In addition, reshuffled genomic sequence structures appeared. These highlight regions of the genome where the gene predictions need to be taken with caution. Based on the new grapevine gene functional annotation and in-depth functional categorization, twenty eight new molecular networks have been created for VitisNet while the existing networks were updated. Conclusions: The outcomes of this study provide a functional annotation of the 12X genes, an update of VitisNet, the system of the grapevine molecular networks, and a new functional categorization of genes. Data are available at the VitisNet website (). © 2012 Grimplet et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Bouquet A., Grapevines and Viticulture, Genetics, Genomics, and Breeding of Grapes, pp. 1-29, (2011)
[2]  
Krzywinski M., Schein J., Birol I., Connors J., Gascoyne R., Horsman D., Jones S.J., Marra M.A., Circos: An information aesthetic for comparative genomics, Genome Res, 19, 9, pp. 1639-1645, (2009)
[3]  
Adam-Blondon A.F., Jaillon O., Vezzulli S., Zharkikh A., Troggio M., Velasco R., Genome Sequence Initiatives, Genetics, Genomics, and Breeding of Grapes, pp. 211-234, (2011)
[4]  
Tillett R., Cushman J., Vitis Functional Genomics: Open Systems for Transcriptome Analysis, Genetics, Genomics, and Breeding of Grapes, pp. 235-269, (2011)
[5]  
Romieu C., Kappel C., Delrot S., Functional Genomics: Closed System Approaches for Transcriptome Analyses, Genetics, Genomics, and Breeding of Grapes, pp. 270-298, (2011)
[6]  
Lund S., Cramer G., Functional Genomics: Proteomics and Metabolomics, Genetics, Genomics, and Breeding of Grapes, pp. 299-316, (2011)
[7]  
Grimplet J., Dickerson J., Adam-Blondon A.-F., Cramer G., Bioinformatics Tools in Grapevine Genomics, Genetics, Genomics, and Breeding of Grapes, pp. 317-331, (2011)
[8]  
Velasco R., Zharkikh A., Troggio M., Cartwright D.A., Cestaro A., Pruss D., Pindo M., FitzGerald L.M., Vezzulli S., Reid J., Malacarne G., Iliev D., Coppola G., Wardell B., Micheletti D., Macalma T., Facci M., Mitchell J.T., Perazzolli M., Eldredge G., Gatto P., Oyzerski R., Moretto M., Gutin N., Stefanini M., Chen Y., Segala C., Davenport C., Dematte L., Mraz A., Battilana J., Stormo K., Costa F., Tao Q., Si-Ammour A., Harkins T., Lackey A., Perbost C., Taillon B., Stella A., Solovyev V., Fawc
[9]  
Jaillon O., Aury J.-M., Noel B., Policriti A., Clepet C., Casagrande A., Choisne N., Aubourg S., Vitulo N., Jubin C., Vezzi A., Legeai F., Hugueney P., Dasilva C., Horner D., Mica E., Jublot D., Poulain J., Bruyere C., Billault A., Segurens B., Gouyvenoux M., Ugarte E., Cattonaro F., Anthouard V., Vico V., Del Fabbro C., Alaux M., Di Gaspero G., Dumas V., Felice N., Paillard S., Juman I., Moroldo M., Scalabrin S., Canaguier A., Le Clainche I., Malacrida G., Durand E., Pesole G., Laucou V., Chat
[10]  
Howe K.L., Chothia T., Durbin R., GAZE: A generic framework for the integration of gene-prediction data by dynamic programming, Genome Res, 12, 9, pp. 1418-1427, (2002)
123