Management of antithrombotic therapy in gray areas of venous thromboembolism: a Delphi consensus panel

被引:0
作者
Giovanni Barillari
Cristiano Bortoluzzi
Mauro Giorgi
Rossana Orabona
Edoarda Pacetti
Edoardo Sciatti
Marco Zaffaroni
Francesco Dentali
机构
[1] Santa Maria Della Misericordia University Hospital,Hemorrhagic and Thrombotic Diseases
[2] SS. Giovanni e Paolo Hospital,Internal Medicine Unit
[3] University Cardiology Unit,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
[4] AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza,Internal Medicine Unit
[5] Molinette Hospital,Department of Medicine and Surgery
[6] ASST Spedali Civili and University,undefined
[7] Internal Medicine Unit,undefined
[8] Cardiology Unit,undefined
[9] ASST Spedali Civili and University,undefined
[10] ASST Monza,undefined
[11] San Gerardo Hospital,undefined
[12] Insubria University,undefined
来源
Internal and Emergency Medicine | 2020年 / 15卷
关键词
Consensus; Delphi; Direct oral anticoagulants; Venous thromboembolism; Vitamin K antagonists; DOAC; NOAC; Warfarin; Pulmonary embolism; Deep vein thrombosis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
For some years now, direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have entered the clinical practice for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) or for prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, there is uncertainty on DOACs’ use in some clinical scenarios that are not fully explored by clinical trials, but commonly encountered in the real world. We report a Delphi Consensus on DOAC use in VTE patients. The consensus dealt with seven main topics: (1) clinical superiority of DOACs compared to VKAs; (2) therapeutic options for patients with intermediate risk PE; (3) therapeutic management of patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT); (4) DOACs’ role in oncological patients with VTE; (5) role of the reversal agent; (6) safety of low doses of DOACs in VTE patients; (7) DOACs long-term therapy (more than 12 months) in VTE patients; Forty-six physicians (cardiologists, internists, angiologists, oncologists, hematologists, and geriatricians) from Italy expressed their level of agreement on each statement by using a five-point Likert scale (1: strongly disagree, 2: disagree, 3: somewhat agree, 4: agree, 5: strongly agree). Votes 1–2 were considered as disagreement, while votes 3–5 as agreement. For each statement an agreement of ≥ 66% among the respondents was considered consensus. A brief discussion about the results for each topic is also reported.
引用
收藏
页码:1255 / 1264
页数:9
相关论文
共 301 条
[1]  
Schulman S(2009)Dabigatran versus warfarin in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism N Engl J Med 361 2342-2352
[2]  
Kearon C(2014)Treatment of acute venous thromboembolism with dabigatran or warfarin and pooled analysis Circulation 129 764-772
[3]  
Kakkar AK(2010)Oral rivaroxaban for symptomatic venous thromboembolism N Engl J Med 363 2499-2510
[4]  
Mismetti P(2012)Oral rivaroxaban for the treatment of symptomatic pulmonary embolism N Engl J Med 366 1287-1297
[5]  
Schellong S(2013)Oral apixaban for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism N Engl J Med 369 799-808
[6]  
Eriksson H(2013)Edoxaban versus warfarin for the treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism N Engl J Med 369 1406-1415
[7]  
Schulman S(2013)Extended use of dabigatran, warfarin, or placebo in venous thromboembolism N Engl J Med 368 709-718
[8]  
Kakkar AK(2013)Apixaban for extended treatment of venous thromboembolism N Engl J Med 368 699-708
[9]  
Goldhaber SZ(2018)Multidisciplinary approach to the management of patients with pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis: a consensus on diagnosis, traditional therapy and therapy with rivaroxaban Intern Emerg Med 13 1037-1049
[10]  
Schellong S(2014)Defining consensus: a systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies J Clin Epidemiol 67 401-409