Blood lactate predicts survival after percutaneous implantation of extracorporeal life support for refractory cardiac arrest or cardiogenic shock complicating acute coronary syndrome: insights from the CareGem registry

被引:0
作者
Italo Porto
Alessio Mattesini
Domenico D’Amario
Carlotta Sorini Dini
Roberta Della Bona
Marco Scicchitano
Rocco Vergallo
Antonio Martellini
Simona Caporusso
Carlo Trani
Francesco Burzotta
Piergiorgio Bruno
Carlo Di Mario
Filippo Crea
Serafina Valente
Massimo Massetti
机构
[1] Italian IRCCS Cardiovascular Network,Dipartimento CardioToracoVascolare, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
[2] Università di Genova,Dipartimento di Medicina Interna e Specialità Mediche (DiMI)
[3] Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi,Dipartimento del Cuore e dei Vasi
[4] Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS,Dipartimento di Scienze Cardiovascolari e Toraciche
[5] Rome,undefined
[6] Italy,undefined
[7] Italian IRCCS Cardiovascular Network and Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore,undefined
[8] Ospedale Sandro Pertini,undefined
[9] IRCCS Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù,undefined
[10] Spedali Riuniti,undefined
[11] U.O.C. Cardiologia Ospedaliera,undefined
[12] A.O.U. Senese Ospedale Santa Maria Alle Scotte,undefined
来源
Internal and Emergency Medicine | 2021年 / 16卷
关键词
Extracorporeal life support; Cardiogenic shock; Cardiac arrest; Acute coronary syndrome;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Refractory cardiogenic shock (RCS) or refractory cardiac arrest (RCA) complicating acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is associated with extremely high mortality rate. Veno-arterial extracorporeal life support (VA-ECLS) represents a valuable therapeutic option to stabilize patients’ condition before or at the time of emergency revascularization. We analyzed 29 consecutive patients with RCS or RCA complicating ACS, and implanted with VA-ECLS in two centers who have adopted a similar, structured approach to ECLS implantation. Data were collected from January 2010 to December 2015 and ECLS had to be percutaneously implanted either before (within 48 h) or at the time of attempted percutaneous coronary revascularization (PCI). We investigated in-hospital outcome and factors associated with survival. Twenty-one (72%) were implanted for RCA, whereas 8 (28%) were implanted on ECLS for RCS. All RCA were witnessed and no-flow time was shorter than 5 min in all cases but one. All patients underwent attempted emergency PCI, using radial access in ten cases (34.5%), whereas in three patients a subsequent CABG was performed. Overall, ten patients (34.5%) survived, nine of them with a good neurological outcome. Life threatening complications, including stroke (4 pts), leg ischemia (4 pts), intestinal ischemia (5 pts), and deep vein thrombosis 2 pts), occurred frequently, but were not associated with in-hospital death. Main cause of death was multi-organ failure. PCI variables did not predict survival. Survivors were younger, with shorter low-flow time, and with ECLS mainly implanted for RCS. At multivariate analysis, levels of lactate at ECLS implantation (OR 4.32, 95%CI 1.01–18.51, p = 0.049) emerged as the only variable that independently predicted survival. In patients with RCA or RCS complicating ACS who are percutaneously implanted with ECLS before or at the time of coronary revascularization, in hospital survival rate is higher than 30%. Level of lactate at ECLS implantation appears to be the most important factor to predict survival.
引用
收藏
页码:463 / 470
页数:7
相关论文
共 240 条
  • [1] Widimsky P(2010)Reperfusion therapy for ST elevation acute myocardial infarction in Europe: description of the current situation in 30 countries Eur Heart J 31 943-957
  • [2] Wijns W(2011)Recent trends in the incidence, treatment, and outcomes of patients with STEMI and NSTEMI Am J Med 124 40-47
  • [3] Fajadet J(2015)Management of cardiogenic shock Eur Heart J 36 1223-1230
  • [4] de Belder M(2015)Experts' recommendations for the management of adult patients with cardiogenic shock Ann Intensive Care 5 52-883
  • [5] Knot J(2016)A Practical approach to mechanical circulatory support in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an interventional perspective JACC Cardiovasc Interv 9 871-1507
  • [6] Aaberge L(2016)Percutaneous mechanical circulatory support: current concepts and future directions Heart 102 1494-E885
  • [7] Andrikopoulos G(2016)Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: an overview of different cannulation techniques J Thorac Dis 8 E875-1371
  • [8] Baz JA(2016)Long-term prognosis after extracorporeal life support in refractory cardiogenic shock: results from a real-world cohort EuroIntervention 11 1363-50
  • [9] Betriu A(2015)Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in acute coronary syndromes complicated by cardiogenic shock Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 86 S45-2256
  • [10] Claeys M(2015)Predicting survival after ECMO for refractory cardiogenic shock: the survival after veno-arterial-ECMO (SAVE)-score Eur Heart J 36 2246-313