Optimization of Wireless Sensor Network and UAV Data Acquisition

被引:0
作者
Dac-Tu Ho
Esten Ingar Grøtli
P. B. Sujit
Tor Arne Johansen
João Borges Sousa
机构
[1] Norwegian University of Science and Technology,Department of Engineering Cybernetics
[2] MARINTEK,Department of Maritime Transport Systems
[3] SINTEF ICT Applied Cybernetics,Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
[4] Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto,undefined
[5] Center for Autonomous Marine Operations and Systems,undefined
来源
Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems | 2015年 / 78卷
关键词
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV); Data Mule; Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO); Waypoint; Wireless Sensor Network (WSN);
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper deals with selection of sensor network communication topology and the use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) for data gathering. The topology consists of a set of cluster heads that communicate with the UAV. In conventional wireless sensor networks Low Energy Adaptive Clustering Hierarchy (LEACH) is commonly used to select cluster heads in order to conserve energy. Energy conservation is far more challenging for large scale deployments. Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) is proposed as an optimization method to find the optimal topology in order to reduce the energy consumption, Bit Error Rate (BER), and UAV travel time. PSO is compared to LEACH using a simulation case and the results show that PSO outperforms LEACH in terms of energy consumption and BER, while the UAV travel time is similar. The numerical results further illustrate that the performance gap between them increases with the number of cluster head nodes. Because of reduced energy consumption, network life time can be significantly extended while increasing the amount of data received from the entire network. By considering the wind effect into the PSO scheme, it is shown that this has an impact on the traveling time for the UAV but BER and energy consumption are not significantly increased.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 179
页数:20
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Purvis K(2008)Estimation and optimal configurations for localization using cooperative UAVs IEEE Trans. on Control System Technology 16 947-958
  • [2] Åström K(2008)Networking issues for small unmmaned aircraft systems J. of Int. and Robotic Sys. 54 21-37
  • [3] Kammash M(2009)UAV trajectory planning for static and dynamic environments InTech, ch 27 581-600
  • [4] Frew EW(2012)Bridging cooperative sensing and route planning of autonomous vehicles IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 30 912-922
  • [5] Brown TX(2011)Networked wireless sensor data collection: Issues, challenges, and approaches IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials 13 673-687
  • [6] Ruz JJ(2012)Path planning for UAVs under communication constraints using SPLAT! and MILP J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 65 265-282
  • [7] Arevalo O(2013)An efficient stochastic clustering auction for heterogeneous robotic collaborative teams J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 72 541-558
  • [8] Pajares G(2012)Centralized and distributed task allocation in multi-robot teams via a stochastic clustering auction ACM Trans. Auton. Adapt. Syst. (TAAS) 7 21-1538
  • [9] De la Cruz JM(1995)Efficient algorithm for globally optimal trajectories IEEE Trans. Autom. Contr. 40 1528-670
  • [10] Sujit PB(2002)An application-specific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor networks IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 1 660-2485