Diagnostic accuracy of the apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating benign from malignant uterine endometrial cavity lesions: initial results

被引:0
作者
Shinya Fujii
Eiji Matsusue
Junzo Kigawa
Shinya Sato
Yoshiko Kanasaki
Junko Nakanishi
Shuji Sugihara
Toshio Kaminou
Naoki Terakawa
Toshihide Ogawa
机构
[1] Tottori University,Division of Radiology, Department of Pathophysiological and Therapeutic Science, Faculty of Medicine
[2] Tottori University,Division of Reproductive
来源
European Radiology | 2008年 / 18卷
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Diffusion-weighted imaging; Uterus; Diagnostic accuracy; Sensitivity; Specificity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Our purpose is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurement in differentiating malignant from benign uterine endometrial cavity lesions. We retrospectively evaluated 25 uterine endometrial cavity lesions in 25 female patients: endometrial carcinoma (n = 11), carcinosarcoma (n = 2), submucosal leiomyoma (n = 8), and endometrial polyp (n = 4). Diffusion-weighted images were performed at 1.5 T with b factors of 0–1,000/mm2. The region of interest was defined within the tumor on T2-weighted EPI image and then manually copied to an ADC map. Thereby, the ADC value was obtained. We compared ADC values between malignant and benign lesions using Student’s t-test. The mean and standard deviation of ADC values (×10−3 mm2/s) were as follows: endometrial carcinoma, 0.98±0.21; carcinosarcoma, 0.97±0.02; submucosal leiomyoma, 1.37±0.28; and endometrial polyp, 1.58±0.45. The ADC values differed significantly between malignant (0.98±0.19) and benign lesions (1.44±0.34) (P < 0.01). We defined malignant tumors as cases with an ADC value less than 1.15 × 10−3 mm2/s for obtaining the highest accuracy. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 84.6%, 100%, and 92%, respectively. ADC measurement can provide useful information in differentiating malignant from benign uterine endometrial cavity lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:384 / 389
页数:5
相关论文
共 209 条
  • [1] Guo Y(2002)Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging J Magn Reson Imaging 16 172-178
  • [2] Cai YQ(2005)ADC mapping of benign and malignant breast tumors Magn Reson Med Sci 4 35-42
  • [3] Cai ZL(2006)Quantitative diffusion imaging in breast cancer: a clinical prospective study J Magn Reson Imaging 24 319-324
  • [4] Gao YG(2006)Hepatic metastases: diffusion-weighted sensitivity-encoding versus SPIO-enhanced MR imaging Radiology 239 122-130
  • [5] An NY(2004)Diffusion-weighted MRI in the evaluation of renal lesions: preliminary results Br J Radiol 77 851-857
  • [6] Ma L(2005)Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of kidneys in healthy volunteers and patients with parenchymal diseases: initial experience Radiology 235 911-917
  • [7] Mahankali S(2006)High-B-value diffusion-weighted MRI in colorectal cancer AJR Am J Roentgenol 187 181-184
  • [8] Gao JH(2005)Differentiation of non-cancerous tissue and cancer lesions by apparent diffusion coefficient values in transition and peripheral zones of the prostate J Magn Reson Imaging 21 258-262
  • [9] Woodhams R(2007)Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for urinary bladder carcinoma: initial results Eur Radiol 17 201-204
  • [10] Matsunaga K(2005)Apparent diffusion coefficient in cervical cancer of the uterus: comparison with the normal uterine cervix Eur Radiol 15 71-78