Stability and survival of bone-anchored hearing aid implant systems in post-irradiated patients

被引:0
作者
Mark D. Wilkie
Kathryn A. Lightbody
Ali A. Salamat
Kalyan M. Chakravarthy
David A. Luff
Robert H. Temple
机构
[1] Countess of Chester Hospital,Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery
来源
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | 2015年 / 272卷
关键词
Bone-anchored hearing aid; Osseointegration; Radiotherapy; Resonance frequency analysis; Implant stability; Implant survival;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHAs) are based on the principle of osseointegration, which is fundamental to implant stability and survival. Previous exposure to ionising radiation may compromise this, as evidenced in relation to dental and craniofacial implants. There is a dearth of data, however, regarding BAHA implant systems in patients with previously irradiated implant sites. We sought, therefore, to investigate implant stability and survival in such patients. Patients were identified retrospectively from our electronic BAHA database. Hospital records were reviewed for demographics; operative technique; complications; and details regarding previous irradiation. Implant stability was assessed by resonance frequency analysis (RFA), generating a numerical value—implant stability quotient (ISQ). Extrapolating from dental studies, successfully loaded implants typically have ISQs of ≥60. Readings were, therefore, interpreted with respect to this. Seven patients were identified for inclusion. Mean time between irradiation and implant insertion was 33 months (range 16–72 months), and mean time from implant insertion to RFA measurement was 41 months (range 3–96 months). Operatively, all patients underwent single-stage procedures under local anaesthesia. One patient suffered a Holger’s grade 2 skin reaction, while two suffered significant skin flap failure, requiring revision procedures. The implant survival rate was 100 %. All ISQ values were >60, with a mean of 66.9 (95 % confidence interval 63.1–70.6). Our data support sufficient osseointegration of BAHA implant systems in post-irradiated patients, but highlight issues with wound healing. Contemporary soft tissue preservation operative techniques will likely overcome this, facilitating safe and efficacious BAHA insertion in this ever-increasing group of patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1371 / 1376
页数:5
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]  
McLarnon CM(2012)Evidence for Early Loading of Osseointegrated Implants for Bone Conduction at 4 Weeks Otol Neurotol 33 1578-1582
[2]  
Johnson I(2007)Craniofacial osseointegration Oral Dis 13 261-269
[3]  
Davidson T(2006)Implant survival in mandibles of irradiated oral cancer patients Clin Oral Implants Res 17 337-344
[4]  
Granstrom G(2009)Effects of radiation therapy on craniofacial and dental implants: a review of the literature Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 107 56-65
[5]  
Yerit KC(2005)Osseointegration in irradiated cancer patients: an analysis with respect to implant failures J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63 579-585
[6]  
Posch M(1993)Bone-anchored reconstruction of the irradiated head and neck patient Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 108 334-343
[7]  
Seemann M(1994)A detailed analysis of titanium implants lost in irradiated tissues Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 9 653-662
[8]  
Ihde S(2007)Oral implants in radiated patients: a systematic review Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 22 616-622
[9]  
Kopp S(2003)Radiotherapy-induced ear toxicity Cancer Treat Rev 29 417-430
[10]  
Gundlach K(2009)The BAHA hearing system for hearing-impaired postirradiated nasopharyngeal cancer patients: a new indication Otol Neurotol 30 496-501