A cross-cultural comparison of image perception and preferences for cotton fabrics between Korea and the United States

被引:0
|
作者
Hye Won Shin
Jung Soon Lee
机构
[1] Chungnam National University,Department of Clothing and Textiles
[2] Dongguk University,Department of Home Economics Education
来源
Fibers and Polymers | 2007年 / 8卷
关键词
Cross-cultural comparison; Fabric image; Preference; Cotton fabric;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this research was to perform an international comparison of image perception and preferences for cotton fabrics, specifically examining the inter-cultural differences that exist between Koreans and Americans. Respondents were asked to rate 55 different fabrics, produced in Korea, relative to eight different characterizations: feminine, masculine, casual, classic, new, old, ambiguous and orderly. Then they were asked to rate their level of preference for each fabric, using 7-point scales. Both Koreans and Americans evaluated thin and soft fabrics with pale colors high relative to feminine image and evaluated slightly thick, coarse and stiff fabrics with low chromatics high relative to masculine image. However, Koreans tended to categorize fabrics as feminine or masculine using color characteristics, while Americans tended to use surface characteristics. For the casual image, Denim and Chambray were rated highly, both in Korea and in the US. There were no fabrics which both countries rated highly for the classic image. New image was rated significantly above average in Korea, but average in the US. The old image perceptions fell below average in both countries. Most fabrics were evaluated above average with respect to being orderly, but fell below the average for ambiguous image, both in Korea and the US. Koreans showed higher preferences for the chosen fabrics than Americans, but the preference tendencies were similar in the two countries.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] A cross-cultural investigation of students' preferences for lecturers' personalities in Britain, Malaysia and the United States
    Swami, Viren
    Furnham, Adrian
    Maakip, Ismail
    Ahmad, Sharani
    Hudani, Nurul
    Voo, Peter S. K.
    Christopher, Andrew N.
    Garwood, Jeanette
    LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2007, 17 (04) : 307 - 315
  • [43] Product Design Innovation and Customer Value: Cross-Cultural Research in the United States and Korea
    Moon, Hakil
    Miller, Douglas R.
    Kim, Sung Hyun
    JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2013, 30 (01) : 31 - 43
  • [44] Perception of a Humanoid Robot: A Cross-Cultural Comparison
    Haring, Kerstin S.
    Silvera-Tawil, David
    Takahashi, Tomotaka
    Velonaki, Mari
    Watanabe, Katsumi
    2015 24TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ROBOT AND HUMAN INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATION (RO-MAN), 2015, : 821 - 826
  • [45] Perception of human ecology: A cross-cultural comparison
    Eisler, A
    Yoshida, M
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 35 (3-4) : 124 - 124
  • [46] The development of temperament and maternal perception of child: A cross-cultural examination in the United States and Japan
    Senzaki, Sawa
    Shimizu, Yuki
    Calma-Birling, Destany
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2021, 170
  • [47] CROSS-CULTURAL QUALITY OF LIFE COMPARISON BETWEEN UNITED STATES AND CHINESE SURVIVORS OF RECURRENT OVARIAN CANCER
    Wang, Liying
    Belcher, Sarah
    Donovan, Heidi
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2018, 45 (02)
  • [48] Does authenticity always breed mental health? A cross-cultural comparison between the United States and China
    Xia, Mengya
    Xu, Xiaobo
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 26 (01) : 132 - 145
  • [49] Music and lyrics in commercials: A cross-cultural comparison between commercials run in the Dominican Republic and in the United States
    Murray, NM
    Murray, SB
    JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING, 1996, 25 (02) : 51 - 63
  • [50] ALCOHOL USE BEHAVIOR AMONG UNDERGRADUATES: A CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND SRI LANKA
    Perera, Bilesha
    Torabi, Mohammad R.
    SOUTHEAST ASIAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2012, 43 (04) : 1025 - 1034