Behavioural indicators of welfare in farmed fish

被引:0
作者
Catarina I. M. Martins
Leonor Galhardo
Chris Noble
Børge Damsgård
Maria T. Spedicato
Walter Zupa
Marilyn Beauchaud
Ewa Kulczykowska
Jean-Charles Massabuau
Toby Carter
Sònia Rey Planellas
Tore Kristiansen
机构
[1] Universidade do Algarve,Centro de Ciências do Mar do Algarve (CCMAR)
[2] Wageningen University,Aquaculture and Fisheries Group
[3] Unidade de Investigação em Eco-Etologia,Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada
[4] Nofima Marin,Laboratoire Ecologie et Neuro
[5] COISPA Tecnologia & Ricerca,Ethologie Sensorielles (EA3988)
[6] Université Jean Monnet,Institute of Oceanology
[7] Polish Academy of Sciences,Station Marine, Université Bordeaux 1
[8] CNRS,undefined
[9] UMR 5805 EPOC,undefined
[10] Anglia Ruskin University,undefined
[11] Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona,undefined
[12] Institute of Marine Research,undefined
来源
Fish Physiology and Biochemistry | 2012年 / 38卷
关键词
Fish behaviour; Well-being; Aquaculture; Operational welfare indicators; Mental states; Stress; Appraisal;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Behaviour represents a reaction to the environment as fish perceive it and is therefore a key element of fish welfare. This review summarises the main findings on how behavioural changes have been used to assess welfare in farmed fish, using both functional and feeling-based approaches. Changes in foraging behaviour, ventilatory activity, aggression, individual and group swimming behaviour, stereotypic and abnormal behaviour have been linked with acute and chronic stressors in aquaculture and can therefore be regarded as likely indicators of poor welfare. On the contrary, measurements of exploratory behaviour, feed anticipatory activity and reward-related operant behaviour are beginning to be considered as indicators of positive emotions and welfare in fish. Despite the lack of scientific agreement about the existence of sentience in fish, the possibility that they are capable of both positive and negative emotions may contribute to the development of new strategies (e.g. environmental enrichment) to promote good welfare. Numerous studies that use behavioural indicators of welfare show that behavioural changes can be interpreted as either good or poor welfare depending on the fish species. It is therefore essential to understand the species-specific biology before drawing any conclusions in relation to welfare. In addition, different individuals within the same species may exhibit divergent coping strategies towards stressors, and what is tolerated by some individuals may be detrimental to others. Therefore, the assessment of welfare in a few individuals may not represent the average welfare of a group and vice versa. This underlines the need to develop on-farm, operational behavioural welfare indicators that can be easily used to assess not only the individual welfare but also the welfare of the whole group (e.g. spatial distribution). With the ongoing development of video technology and image processing, the on-farm surveillance of behaviour may in the near future represent a low-cost, noninvasive tool to assess the welfare of farmed fish.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 41
页数:24
相关论文
共 626 条
[1]  
Alanärä A(1996)Dominance in demand-feeding behaviour in Arctic charr and rainbow trout: the effect of stocking density J Fish Biol 48 242-254
[2]  
Brännäs E(1998)Feeding behaviour, brain serotonergic activity levels, and energy reserves of Arctic char ( Can J Zool 76 212-220
[3]  
Alanärä A(2004)) within a dominance hierarchy Aquaculture 231 347-359
[4]  
Winberg S(2005)Behavioural responses under different feeding methods and light regimes of the African catfish ( J Fish Biol 67 1029-1039
[5]  
Brännäs E(2002)) juveniles Aquacult Res 33 501-507
[6]  
Kiessling A(2004)Photoperiod affects growth, behaviour and stress variables in Clarias gariepinus Aquaculture 232 317-331
[7]  
Höglund E(2007)The effect of demand feeding on swimming speed and feeding responses in Atlantic salmon Appl Anim Behav Sci 104 199-235
[8]  
Elofsson U(2007) L., gilthead sea bream Appl Anim Behav Sci 104 251-264
[9]  
Almazán-Rueda P(2004) L. and European sea bass Behav Process 66 43-51
[10]  
Schrama JW(2006) L. in sea cages J Exp Anim Sci 43 189-196