Percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction

被引:3
作者
Ryan T.J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Section of Cardiology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA 02118
关键词
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Acute Myocardial Infarction; Abciximab; Coronary Stenting; Fibrinolytic Therapy;
D O I
10.1007/s11886-001-0080-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This review traces the development of coronary angioplasty as a direct, primary means of establishing reperfusion in an acutely occluded infarct-related artery. As a therapeutic strategy for the early management of patients with ST-elevated acute myocardial infarction, this mechanical-invasive procedure arose virtually simultaneously with the demonstration that intravenous administration of fibrinolytic agents to such patients results in a relative reduction in early mortality by as much as 25% to 30%. Over the past 15 years, more than a dozen randomized, controlled trials have investigated the question, "Which is the better means of administrating reperfusion therapy?" The recent demonstration that the combination of coronary stenting plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors used in the early stages of ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction salvages more myocardium than the administration of front-loaded tissue plasminogen activator offers a convincing answer. This is further supported by the evidence that clinical outcomes also improved in these patients, with the greater improvement in ventricular function. It is likely, however, that the development of newer pharmacologic agents plus the combination of both strategies will keep this a hotly debated issue for some time to come. © 2001 by Current Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 279
页数:6
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Meyer J., Merx W., Schmitz H., Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty immediately after intracoronary streptolysis of transmural myocardial infarction, Circulation, 66, pp. 905-913, (1982)
[2]  
Hartzler G.O., Rutherford B.D., McConahay D.R., Et al., Percutaneous coronary angioplasty with and without thrombolytic therapy for treatment of acute myocardial infarction, Am Heart J, 106, pp. 965-973, (1983)
[3]  
White H.D., Norris R., Brown M.A., Et al., Effect of intravenous streptokinase on left ventricular function and early survival after acute myocardial infarction, N Engl J Med, 317, pp. 850-855, (1987)
[4]  
Kennedy J.W., Martin F.V., Davis K.B., Et al., The Western Washington intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction randomized trial, Circulation, 77, pp. 345-352, (1988)
[5]  
Effectiveness of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction, Lancet, 1, pp. 397-402, (1986)
[6]  
Randomized trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2, Lancet, 2, pp. 349-360, (1988)
[7]  
Topol E.J., Califf R.M., George B.S., Et al., The Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group: A randomized trial of immediate versus delayed elective angioplasty after intravenous tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction, N Engl J Med, 317, pp. 581-588, (1987)
[8]  
Simoons M.L., Betriu A., Col J., Et al., Thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction: No additional benefit from immediate percutaneous coronary angioplasty, Lancet, 1, pp. 197-202, (1988)
[9]  
Timi Study Group T., Immediate versus delayed catheterization and angioplasty following thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: TIMI II A results, JAMA, 260, pp. 2849-2858, (1988)
[10]  
O'keefe J.H., Rutherford B.D., McConahay D.R., Et al., Early and late results of coronary angioplasty without antecedent thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction, Am J Cardiol, 64, pp. 1221-1230, (1989)