Nonconvex Bargaining Problems: Some Recent Developments

被引:0
作者
Yongsheng Xu
Naoki Yoshihara
机构
[1] Georgia State University,Department of Economics, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies
[2] University of Massachusetts Amherst,Department of Economics
来源
Homo Oeconomicus | 2020年 / 37卷
关键词
Nonconvex bargaining problem; Nash solution; Equitable Nash solution; Kalai-Smorodinsky solution; Egalitarian solution; Resource allocation problem; C71; C78; D63; D71;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper presents a survey of the recent theoretical results on solutions to nonconvex bargaining problems. We discuss rationalizability of solutions to nonconvex bargaining problems, axiomatic characterizations of the symmetric and asymmetric Nash solution, the Kalai-Smorodinsky solution, and the egalitarian solution to nonconvex bargaining problems, and applications in the context of resource allocation and of bargaining over opportunity sets.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 41
页数:34
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
Arneson R(1989)Equality and equal opportunity for welfare Philosophical Studies 56 77-93
[2]  
Bishop R(1960)Duopoly: Collusion or Warfare? American Economic Review 50 933-61
[3]  
Bossert W(1994)Rational choice and two-person bargaining solutions Journal of Mathematical Economics 23 549-563
[4]  
Chen M(1999)Bargaining, Production, and Monotonicity in Economic Environments Journal of Economic Theory 89 140-147
[5]  
Maskin E(1954)Rational selection of decision functions Econometrica 22 422-443
[6]  
Chernoff H(1991)The bargaining problem without convexity: extending the egalitarian and Kalai-Smorodinsky solutions Economics Letters 36 365-369
[7]  
Conley J(1996)An extension of the Nash bargaining solution to nonconvex problems Games and Economic Behavior 13 26-38
[8]  
Wilkie S(2000)Nash Bargaining Theory, Nonconvex Problems and Social Welfare Orderings Theory and Decision 48 351-358
[9]  
Conley J(1981)What is Equality? Part 1: Equality of Welfare Philosophy and Public Affairs 10 185-246
[10]  
Wilkie S(1981)What is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources Philosophy and Public Affairs 10 283-345