The coffee agroecosystem: bio-economic analysis of coffee berry borer control (Hypothenemus hampei)

被引:0
|
作者
José Ricardo Cure
Daniel Rodríguez
Andrew Paul Gutierrez
Luigi Ponti
机构
[1] Universidad Militar Nueva Granada,Facultad de Ciencias Básicas y Aplicadas
[2] University of California,Division of Ecosystem Science, College of Natural Resources
[3] Agenzia nazionale per le nuove tecnologie,undefined
[4] l’energia e lo sviluppo economico sostenibile (ENEA),undefined
[5] Centro Ricerche Casaccia,undefined
[6] Center for the Analysis of Sustainable Agricultural Systems Global (Casasglobal.Org),undefined
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Coffee, after petroleum, is the most valuable commodity globally in terms of total value (harvest to coffee cup). Here, our bioeconomic analysis considers the multitude of factors that influence coffee production. The system model used in the analysis incorporates realistic field models based on considerable new field data and models for coffee plant growth and development, the coffee/coffee berry borer (CBB) dynamics in response to coffee berry production and the role of the CBB parasitoids and their interactions in control of CBB. Cultural control of CBB by harvesting, cleanup of abscised fruits, and chemical sprays previously considered are reexamined here to include biopesticides for control of CBB such as entomopathogenic fungi (Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium anisopliae) and entomopathogenic nematodes (Steinernema sp., Heterorhabditis). The bioeconomic analysis estimates the potential of each control tactic singly and in combination for control of CBB. The analysis explains why frequent intensive harvesting of coffee is by far the most effective and economically viable control practice for reducing CBB infestations in Colombia and Brazil.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] COFFEE BERRY BORER, HYPOTHENEMUS-HAMPEI FERR - CONSIDERATIONS ON INTEGRATED CONTROL OF THIS PEST
    DECAZY, B
    13TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC COLLOQUIUM ON COFFEE, 1989, : 655 - 665
  • [22] Identification of attractant and repellent plants to coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei
    Maria Castro, Ana
    Tapias, Johanna
    Ortiz, Aristofeles
    Benavides, Pablo
    Gongora, Carmenza E.
    ENTOMOLOGIA EXPERIMENTALIS ET APPLICATA, 2017, 164 (02) : 120 - 130
  • [23] The Coffee Berry Borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Ferr.) detected in Guadeloupe
    Dufour, Bernard Pierre
    Diman, Christiane
    Mateo, Aurelie de San
    Mouttet, Raphaelle
    CAHIERS AGRICULTURES, 2022, 31
  • [24] Semiochemicals used in Host Location by the Coffee berry Borer, Hypothenemus hampei
    Mendesil, Esayas
    Bruce, Toby J. A.
    Woodcock, Christine M.
    Caulfield, John C.
    Seyoum, Emiru
    Pickett, John A.
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ECOLOGY, 2009, 35 (08) : 944 - 950
  • [25] Caffeine and resistance of coffee to the berry borer Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Scolytidae)
    Guerreiro, O
    Mazzafera, P
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2003, 51 (24) : 6987 - 6991
  • [26] Parasitism of the coffee berry borer Hypothenemus hampei by Trichogramma pretiosum in the laboratory
    Meza, JL
    Barrera, JF
    Perez-Lachaud, G
    Williams, T
    BIOCONTROL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 14 (04) : 409 - 416
  • [27] Coffee berry borer Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Curculionidae):: searching for sustainable control strategies
    Jaramillo, J.
    Borgemeister, C.
    Baker, P.
    BULLETIN OF ENTOMOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2006, 96 (03) : 223 - 233
  • [28] Methodology to Test Control Agents and Insecticides Against the Coffee Berry Borer Hypothenemus hampei
    Gongora, Carmenza E.
    Tapias, Johanna
    Martinez, Claudia P.
    Benavides, Pablo
    JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS, 2022, (181):
  • [29] PRESENT STATUS OF BIOLOGICAL-CONTROL OF THE COFFEE BERRY BORER HYPOTHENEMUS-HAMPEI
    MOORE, D
    PRIOR, C
    BRIGHTON CROP PROTECTION CONFERENCE : PESTS AND DISEASES - 1988, VOLS 1-3, 1988, : 1119 - 1124
  • [30] Semiochemicals used in Host Location by the Coffee berry Borer, Hypothenemus hampei
    Esayas Mendesil
    Toby J. A. Bruce
    Christine M. Woodcock
    John C. Caulfield
    Emiru Seyoum
    John A. Pickett
    Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2009, 35 : 944 - 950