Optimization of Process Parameters for Removal of Arsenic Using Activated Carbon-Based Iron-Containing Adsorbents by Response Surface Methodology

被引:0
作者
Aslı Özge Avcı Tuna
Ercan Özdemir
Esra Bilgin Simsek
Ulker Beker
机构
[1] Yildiz Technical University,Chemical Engineering Department
[2] Gebze Institute of Technology,Clean Energy and Nanotechnology Research Center
[3] Yalova University,Chemical and Process Engineering Department
来源
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution | 2013年 / 224卷
关键词
Activated carbon; Iron (oxy-hydr) oxides; Arsenic; Box–Behnken; Response surface methodology;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this study, arsenate removal by apricot stone-based activated carbon (IAC) modified with iron (oxy-hydr)oxides was carried out. For this purpose, hybrid adsorbents based on Fe2+-loaded activated carbon (IAC–Fe(II)) and Fe3+-loaded activated carbon (IAC–Fe(III)) were synthesized by precipitation method. A three-level, three-factor Box–Behnken experimental design combined with response surface methodology (RSM) was employed to find the optimum combination of process parameters for maximizing the As(V) adsorption capacity of activated carbon-based iron-containing hybrid adsorbent. Three important operation parameters, namely, initial pH of solution (3.0–7.0), temperature (25–65 °C), and initial As(V) concentration (0.5–8.5 mg L−1), were chosen as the independent variables, while the As(V) adsorption capacities of hybrid adsorbents were designated as dependent variables. Lack of fit test showed that the quadratic model provided the best fit to experimental data for both adsorbents with the highest coefficients of determination (R2), adjusted R2, and p-values for lack of fit. The standardized effects of the independent variables and their interactions were tested by analysis of variance and Pareto chart. The model F-values (FIAC–Fe(II)=330.39 and FIAC–Fe(III)=36.19) and R2 values (R2IAC–Fe(II)=0.9977 and R2IAC–Fe(III)=0.9789) of second-order polynomial regression equations indicated the significance of the regression models. Optimum process conditions for As(V) adsorption onto IAC–Fe(II) were 63.68 °C, pH 3.10, and 8.4 mg L−1 initial arsenic concentration, while 25.22 °C, pH 3.07, and 8.28 mg L−1 initial As(V) concentration were found to be optimum conditions for IAC–Fe(III).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 145 条
[1]  
Aksu Z(2004)Biosorption of phenol by immobilized activated sludge in a continuous packed bed: prediction of breakthrough curves Process Biochemistry 39 599-613
[2]  
Gönen F(2011)Determination of arsenic levels in the water resources of Aksaray Province, Turkey Journal of Environmental Management 92 2182-2192
[3]  
Altaş¸ L(2002)Arsenic adsorption from aqueous solutions by activated red mud Waste Management 22 357-363
[4]  
Işık M(2012)Source of arsenic based on geological and hydrogeochemical properties of geothermal systems in Western Turkey Chemical Geology 334 364-377
[5]  
Kavurmacı M(2011)Optimization of Cu(II) extraction from aqueous solutions by soybean-oil-based organic solvent using response surface methodology Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 217 567-576
[6]  
Altundoğan HS(2009)Geochemical processes controlling fate and transport of arsenic in acid mine drainage (AMD) and natural systems Journal of Hazardous Materials 165 13-26
[7]  
Altundoğan S(2011)Arsenic removal from aqueous solutions by mixed magnetite–maghemite nanoparticles Environmental Earth Science 64 411-423
[8]  
Tümen F(2009)Iron oxide nanoparticle-assisted arsenic removal from aqueous system Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part A: Toxic/Hazardous Substances and Environmental Engineering 44 155-162
[9]  
Bildik M(2011)Importance of carbon surface chemistry in development of iron–carbon composite adsorbents for arsenate removal Journal of Hazardous Materials 186 667-674
[10]  
Baba A(2011)Magnetic binary oxide particles (MBOP): a promising adsorbent for removal of As(III) in water Water Research 45 4769-4781