Do people have differing motivations for participating in a stated-preference study? Results from a latent-class analysis

被引:0
作者
Ilene L. Hollin
Ellen Janssen
Marcella A. Kelley
John F. P. Bridges
机构
[1] Temple University College of Public Health,Department of Health Services Administration and Policy
[2] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health,Department of Health Policy and Management
[3] University of Southern California,Department of Pharmaceutical and Health Economics, School of Pharmacy
[4] University of Southern California,Leonard D. Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics
[5] The Ohio State University College of Medicine,Department of Biomedical Informatics
[6] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health,Department of Health Behavior and Society
来源
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making | / 21卷
关键词
Stated preferences; Surveys; Discrete choice experiments;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]  
Hauber AB(2013)Quantifying benefit-risk preferences for medical interventions: an overview of a growing empirical literature Appl Health Econ Health Policy 11 319-329
[2]  
Fairchild AO(2019)Methods for measuring patient preferences: an update and future directions Curr Opin Rheumatol 31 125-131
[3]  
Johnson FR(2017)Improving the quality of discrete-choice experiments in health: how can we assess validity and reliability? Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 17 531-542
[4]  
Meara A(2019)The interal validity of discrete choice experiment data: a testing tool for quantitative assessments Value Health 22 157-160
[5]  
Crossnohere NL(2018)Assessing rationality in discrete choice experiments in health: an investigation into the use of dominance tests Value Health 21 1192-1197
[6]  
Bridges JFP(2016)Methods for the detection of carelessly invalid responses in survey data J Exp Soc Psychol 66 4-19
[7]  
Janssen EM(2011)Individual differences in motivation to participate in online panels: the effect on reponse rate and reponse quality perceptions Int J Mark Res 53 3-129
[8]  
Marsall D(2005)Ascertaining the validity of individual protocols from web-based personality inventories J Res Personal 39 103-315
[9]  
Hauber AB(2015)Lost in the crowd? Using eye-tracking to investigate the effect of complexity on attribute non-attendance in discrete choice experiments BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 16 1-13
[10]  
Bridges J(2016)Statistical methods for the analysis of discrete choice experiments: a report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force Value Health 19 300-313