Institutional logics of Chinese doctoral education system

被引:0
作者
Gaoming Zheng
Wenqin Shen
Yuzhuo Cai
机构
[1] University of Tampere,Faculty of Management
[2] Peking University,Graduate School of Education
[3] University of Tampere,Faculty of Management
来源
Higher Education | 2018年 / 76卷
关键词
Doctoral education; Higher education; China; Context; Institutional logics;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
As Chinese doctoral education has grown dramatically in the past four decades and developed into one of the largest doctoral education systems in the world, it has become one significant and integral part of the global doctoral education landscape. However, in the literature, there is a lack of both a comprehensive understanding of the Chinese doctoral education system and of generic frameworks for understanding doctoral education in a global context, with an emphasis on the underlying value systems. This may not only hamper the research on doctoral education in China but also affect international comparison and collaboration with Chinese doctoral education. Using the theory of institutional logics, this study tries to bridge the gap by identifying the complex value systems underlying the context of the Chinese doctoral education system, through a qualitative study mainly based on interview data and complemented by documentary data. The interview involves 135 participants, including 45 university academic leaders, 33 doctoral supervisors and 56 doctoral students from 17 research universities, as well as one government policy-maker. We found that the context of Chinese doctoral education system consists of multiple logics of state, profession, family, market and corporation. The special constellation of institutional logics has shaped the current Chinese doctoral education system as a state-led model but meanwhile incorporating family characteristics, market orientation and regulated academic autonomy. The study also showed that Chinese doctoral education has been developing in line with international academic norms and global marketization trends, and has also been shaped by China’s socio-cultural tradition and the strong state regulation. In addition to the institutional logics analysis of the Chinese doctoral education system, this study paves the way for developing a novel framework for analysing doctoral education systems in other contexts and for comparative purposes.
引用
收藏
页码:753 / 770
页数:17
相关论文
共 73 条
  • [1] Austin AE(2002)Preparing the next generation of faculty: graduate school as socialization to the academic career The Journal of Higher Education 73 94-122
  • [2] Bao Yanhua(2016)From product to process. The reform of doctoral education in Europe and China Studies in Higher Education 43 524-541
  • [3] Kehm Barbara M.(2001)Comparative education in greater China: contexts, characteristics, contrasts and contributions Comparative Education 37 451-473
  • [4] Ma Yonghong(2010)Global isomorphism and governance reform in Chinese higher education Tertiary Education and Management 16 229-241
  • [5] Bray M(2012)Traditional reform philosophy and challenges of higher education reforms in China International Journal of Humanities and Social Science 2 61-69
  • [6] Gui Q(2014)Implementing the Triple Helix model in a non-Western context: an institutional logics perspective Triple Helix 1 1-20
  • [7] Cai Y(2015)What contextual factors shape “innovation in innovation”?—integration of insights of the Triple Helix and the institutional logics perspective Social Science Information 54 299-326
  • [8] Cai Y(2017)Indigenous knowledges and supervision: Changing the lens Innovations in Education and Teaching International 55 384-393
  • [9] Cai Y(2010)The transformation of knowledge production mode and the quality crises in doctoral education (in Chinese) Journal of Higher Education 31 57-63
  • [10] Cai Y(2016)Degree authorisation audit mechanism reform and the path adjustment of postgraduate education governance in China (in Chinese) Educational Reseach 1 17-25