Biomarker-guided antibiotic therapy in adult critically ill patients: a critical review

被引:0
作者
Pedro Póvoa
Jorge I F Salluh
机构
[1] Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental,Polyvalent Intensive Care Unit, Hospital de São Francisco Xavier
[2] New University of Lisbon,CEDOC, Faculty of Medical Sciences
[3] D’Or Institute for Research and Education,Postgraduation Program
[4] Instituto Nacional de Câncer,undefined
来源
Annals of Intensive Care | / 2卷
关键词
Antibiotic stewardship; Biomarkers; C-reactive protein; Infection; Procalcitonin; Sepsis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Biomarkers of infection, namely C-reactive protein and procalcitonin (PCT), are potentially useful in the diagnosis of infection as well as in the assessment of its response to antibiotic therapy. C-reactive protein variations overtime appears to have a good performance for the diagnosis of infection. Procalcitonin shows a better correlation with clinical severity. In addition, to overcome the worldwide problem of antibiotic overuse as well as misuse, biomarker guidance of antibiotic stewardship represents a promising new approach. In several randomized, controlled trials, including adult critically ill patients, PCT guidance was repeatedly associated with a decrease in the duration of antibiotic therapy. However, these trials present several limitations, namely high rate of patients’ exclusion, high rate of algorithm overruling, long duration of antibiotic therapy in the control group, disregard the effect of renal failure on PCT level, and above all a possible higher mortality and higher late organ failure in the PCT arm. In addition, some infections (e.g., endocarditis) as well as frequent nosocomial bacteria (e.g., Pseudomonas aeruginosa) are not suitable to be assessed by PCT algorithms. Therefore, the true value of PCT-guided algorithm of antibiotic stewardship in assisting the clinical decision-making process at the bedside remains uncertain. Future studies should take into account the issues identified in the present review.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 285 条
[11]  
Povoa PR(2008)Serum markers in community-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia Curr Opin Infect Dis 21 157-2598
[12]  
Carneiro AH(2003)Measures, markers, and mediators: toward a staging system for clinical sepsis. A report of the Fifth Toronto Sepsis Roundtable, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, October 25–26, 2000 Crit Care Med 31 1560-1799
[13]  
Ribeiro OS(2003)Comparison of 8 vs 15 days of antibiotic therapy for ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults: a randomized trial JAMA 290 2588-1812
[14]  
Pereira AC(2004)A randomized controlled trial of an antibiotic discontinuation policy for clinically suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia Chest 125 1791-454
[15]  
Levy MM(2003)C-reactive protein: a critical update J Clin Invest 111 1805-158
[16]  
Dellinger RP(1999)Acute-phase proteins and other systemic responses to inflammation N Engl J Med 340 448-746
[17]  
Townsend SR(1997)Acute phase proteins, C-reactive protein and serum amyloid A protein, as prognostic markers in the elderly inpatient Age Ageing 26 153-243
[18]  
Linde-Zwirble WT(1997)Clinical applications of C-reactive protein in pediatrics Pediatr Infect Dis J 16 735-1357
[19]  
Marshall JC(2002)C-reactive protein: a valuable marker of sepsis Intensive Care Med 28 235-583
[20]  
Bion J(1993)Metabolic and scintigraphic studies of radioiodinated human C-reactive protein in health and disease J Clin Invest 91 1351-200