Biomarker-guided antibiotic therapy in adult critically ill patients: a critical review

被引:0
作者
Pedro Póvoa
Jorge I F Salluh
机构
[1] Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental,Polyvalent Intensive Care Unit, Hospital de São Francisco Xavier
[2] New University of Lisbon,CEDOC, Faculty of Medical Sciences
[3] D’Or Institute for Research and Education,Postgraduation Program
[4] Instituto Nacional de Câncer,undefined
来源
Annals of Intensive Care | / 2卷
关键词
Antibiotic stewardship; Biomarkers; C-reactive protein; Infection; Procalcitonin; Sepsis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Biomarkers of infection, namely C-reactive protein and procalcitonin (PCT), are potentially useful in the diagnosis of infection as well as in the assessment of its response to antibiotic therapy. C-reactive protein variations overtime appears to have a good performance for the diagnosis of infection. Procalcitonin shows a better correlation with clinical severity. In addition, to overcome the worldwide problem of antibiotic overuse as well as misuse, biomarker guidance of antibiotic stewardship represents a promising new approach. In several randomized, controlled trials, including adult critically ill patients, PCT guidance was repeatedly associated with a decrease in the duration of antibiotic therapy. However, these trials present several limitations, namely high rate of patients’ exclusion, high rate of algorithm overruling, long duration of antibiotic therapy in the control group, disregard the effect of renal failure on PCT level, and above all a possible higher mortality and higher late organ failure in the PCT arm. In addition, some infections (e.g., endocarditis) as well as frequent nosocomial bacteria (e.g., Pseudomonas aeruginosa) are not suitable to be assessed by PCT algorithms. Therefore, the true value of PCT-guided algorithm of antibiotic stewardship in assisting the clinical decision-making process at the bedside remains uncertain. Future studies should take into account the issues identified in the present review.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 285 条
[1]  
Angus DC(2001)Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care Crit Care Med 29 1303-1310
[2]  
Linde-Zwirble WT(2003)The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000 N Engl J Med 348 1546-1554
[3]  
Lidicker J(2009)Influence of vasopressor agent in septic shock mortality. Results from the Portuguese Community-Acquired Sepsis Study (SACiUCI study) Crit Care Med 37 410-416
[4]  
Clermont G(2010)The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: results of an international guideline-based performance improvement program targeting severe sepsis Intensive Care Med 36 222-231
[5]  
Carcillo J(2009)Effectiveness of treatments for severe sepsis: a prospective, multicenter, observational study Am J Respir Crit Care Med 180 861-866
[6]  
Pinsky MR(2000)Short-course empiric antibiotic therapy for patients with pulmonary infiltrates in the intensive care unit. A proposed solution for indiscriminate antibiotic prescription Am J Respir Crit Care Med 162 505-511
[7]  
Martin GS(2011)Prompting physicians to address a daily checklist and process of care and clinical outcomes: a single-site study Am J Respir Crit Care Med 184 680-686
[8]  
Mannino DM(2010)Clinical review: the role of biomarkers in the diagnosis and management of community-acquired pneumonia Crit Care 14 203-1596
[9]  
Eaton S(2010)Sepsis biomarkers: a review Crit Care 14 R15-162
[10]  
Moss M(2006)Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock Crit Care Med 34 1589-1567