Translation of the updated clinical frailty scale 2.0 into Danish and implications for cross-sectoral reliability

被引：0

作者：

Anders Fournaise

Søren Kabell Nissen

Jørgen T. Lauridsen

Jesper Ryg

Christian H. Nickel

Claire Gudex

Mikkel Brabrand

Lone Musaeus Poulsen

Karen Andersen-Ranberg

机构：

[1] Department of Cross-sectoral Collaboration,Department of Geriatric Medicine

[2] Odense University Hospital,Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Biodemography, Department of Public Health

[3] University of Southern Denmark,Institute of Regional Health Research

[4] Centre South West Jutland,Department of Emergency Medicine

[5] University of Southern Denmark,Department of Business and Economics

[6] Hospital of South West Jutland,Department of Clinical Research

[7] University of Southern Denmark,Emergency Department

[8] University of Southern Denmark,Department of Emergency Medicine

[9] University Hospital Basel,Department of Anaesthesiology

[10] University of Basel,undefined

[11] Open Patient data Explorative Network (OPEN),undefined

[12] Odense University Hospital,undefined

[13] Zealand University Hospital,undefined

[14] Collaboration for Research in Intensive Care (CRIC),undefined

来源：

BMC Geriatrics | / 21卷

关键词：

Cross-sectoral collaboration; Continuity of care; ISPOR translation; Validation; Reliability; Geriatrics; Clinical frailty scale;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

The Clinical Frailty Scale, which provides a common language about frailty, was recently updated to version 2.0 to cater for its increased use in areas of medicine usually involved in the care and treatment of older patients. We have previously translated the Clinical Frailty Scale 1.2 into Danish and found inter-rater-reliability to be excellent for primary care physicians, community nurses, and hospital doctors often involved in cross-sectoral collaborations. In this correspondence we present the Danish translation and cultural adaption of the Clinical Frailty Scale 2.0. Our recent findings on cross-sectoral inter-rater reliability for the Clinical Frailty Scale 1.2 are likely also applicable for the Clinical Frailty Scale 2.0.

引用

共 42 条

[1]

Nissen SK(2020)Cross-sectoral inter-rater reliability of the clinical frailty scale – a Danish translation and validation study BMC Geriatr 20 443-215

[2]

Fournaise A(2020)Using the clinical frailty scale in allocating scarce health care resources Can Geriatr J 23 210-104

[3]

Lauridsen JT(2018)What do we know about frailty in the acute care setting? A scoping review BMC Geriatr 18 139-495

[4]

Ryg J(2020)A scoping review of the clinical frailty scale BMC Geriatr 20 393-undefined

[5]

Nickel CH(2005)Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation Value Heal 8 94-undefined

[6]

Gudex C(2005)A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people CMAJ. 173 489-undefined

[7]

Brabrand M(2021)Reliability of the clinical frailty scale in very elderly ICU patients: a prospective European study Ann Intensive Care 11 22-undefined

[8]

Andersen-Ranberg K(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined

[9]

Rockwood K(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined

[10]

Theou O(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined

← 1 2 3 4 5 →