Barriers affecting implementation of life cycle cost analysis in construction projects: SEM approach

被引:0
作者
Muhammad Altaf
Wesam Salah Alaloul
Muhammad Ali Musarat
Sherif Mostafa
Rodney Stewart
Ali Hussain
Muhammad Babar Ali Rabbani
Syed Saad
Syed Ammad
机构
[1] Griffith University,School of Engineering and Built Environment
[2] Gold Coast,Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
[3] Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS,Offshore Engineering Centre, Institute of Autonomous System
[4] Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS,Department of Civil Engineering
[5] Sarhad University of Science and Information Technology,Department of Civil Engineering
[6] CECOS University,undefined
来源
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions | 2024年 / 9卷
关键词
Life cycle cost analysis (LCCA); LCCA barriers; LCCA implementation in construction; Structure equation modelling (SEM); Partial least square (PLS) method;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The future cash flow associated with construction projects remains the most significant challenge to be reviewed in the initial stages. Life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) is an efficient approach for determining the associated future cost of a project. However, despite its significance, LCCA has yet to be implemented in construction projects due to certain barriers. This study aims to identify LCCA barrier factors and analyse their correlation using a structural equation (SEM) model. To achieve the aim of the study, an extensive literature review was conducted about LCCA barriers and their impact on implementation, followed by an SEM. Centralised relationships and hypotheses were developed to reflect the interactions amongst the variables logically. Finally, a questionnaire survey amongst the construction industry professionals was undertaken to assess barriers to implementing LCCA. Relative importance index (RII) is used to rank the individual factors. Whereas partial least square (PLS) method was applied to analyse the data and evaluate the impact of the classified latent variables on LCCA implementation. Results show that data availability and LCCA knowledge are the most significant barriers influencing LCCA implementation. The lack of policies, time and motivation also affects the implementation of this approach. However, budget constraints and uncertainty do not significantly affect LCCA implementation.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 117 条
[1]  
Fregonara E(2018)Economic–environmental sustainability in building projects: introducing risk and uncertainty in LCCE and LCCA Sustainability 10 1901-200
[2]  
Ferrando DG(2016)From life cycle costing to economic life cycle assessment—introducing an economic impact pathway Sustainability 8 428-834
[3]  
Pattono S(2018)Comparative analysis between a complete LCA study and results from a BIM-LCA plug-in Autom Constr 90 188-554
[4]  
Neugebauer S(2016)Evaluation of non-cost factors affecting the life cycle cost: an exploratory study J Eng Des Technol 14 818-454
[5]  
Forin S(2021)Evaluation of facilities management sustainable parameters for improving operational efficiency Int J Constr Manag 21 538-375
[6]  
Finkbeiner M(2022)Evaluating the awareness and implementation level of LCCA in the construction industry of Malaysia Ain Shams Eng J 13 101686-12
[7]  
Bueno C(2016)Life cycle cost analysis of commercial buildings with energy efficient approach Perspect Sci 8 452-9
[8]  
Fabricio MM(2012)Implementing life cycle costing in Malaysian construction industry: a review J Civ Eng Archit 6 1202-48
[9]  
Alqahtani A(2000)Reconciling theory and practice of life-cycle costing Build Res Inf 28 368-8
[10]  
Whyte A(2020)A through-life cost analysis model to support investment decision-making in concentrated solar power projects Energies 13 1553-1206