A Semantics for Hyperintensional Belief Revision Based on Information Bases

被引:0
作者
Sena Bozdag
机构
[1] LMU,Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy
来源
Studia Logica | 2022年 / 110卷
关键词
Belief revision; Situation semantics; Hyperintensional logic; Dynamic epistemic logic; Dynamic doxastic logic; Non-monotonic logic; Non-classical logics; Non-classical semantics; Epistemic logic; Non-monotonic reasoning;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
I propose a novel hyperintensional semantics for belief revision and a corresponding system of dynamic doxastic logic. The main goal of the framework is to reduce some of the idealisations that are common in the belief revision literature and in dynamic epistemic logic. The models of the new framework are primarily based on potentially incomplete or inconsistent collections of information, represented by situations in a situation space. I propose that by shifting the representational focus of doxastic models from belief sets to collections of information, and by defining changes of beliefs as artifacts of changes of information, we can achieve a more realistic account of belief representation and belief change. The proposed dynamic operation suggests a non-classical way of changing beliefs: belief revision occurs in non-explosive environments which allow for a non-monotonic and hyperintensional belief dynamics. A logic that is sound with respect to the semantics is also provided.
引用
收藏
页码:679 / 716
页数:37
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Probabilistic dynamic belief revision [J].
Baltag, Alexandru ;
Smets, Sonja .
SYNTHESE, 2008, 165 (02) :179-202
[22]   Towards a belief-revision-based adaptive and context-sensitive information retrieval system [J].
Lau, Raymond Y. K. ;
Bruza, Peter D. ;
Song, Dawei .
ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2008, 26 (02)
[23]   Interrogative Belief Revision Based on Epistemic Strategies [J].
Sebastian Enqvist .
Studia Logica, 2012, 100 :453-479
[24]   Interrogative Belief Revision Based on Epistemic Strategies [J].
Enqvist, Sebastian .
STUDIA LOGICA, 2012, 100 (03) :453-479
[25]   A MODEL-BASED BELIEF REVISION SYSTEM [J].
CHOU, TSC ;
WINSLETT, M .
JOURNAL OF AUTOMATED REASONING, 1994, 12 (02) :157-208
[26]   Belief in truthmaker semantics [J].
Jago, Mark .
SYNTHESE, 2024, 204 (04)
[27]   Truth-Tracking by Belief Revision [J].
Baltag, Alexandru ;
Gierasimczuk, Nina ;
Smets, Sonja .
STUDIA LOGICA, 2019, 107 (05) :917-947
[28]   Abductive logics in a belief revision framework [J].
Bernard Walliser ;
Denis Zwirn ;
Hervé Zwirn .
Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 2004, 14 (1) :87-117
[29]   Truth-Tracking by Belief Revision [J].
Alexandru Baltag ;
Nina Gierasimczuk ;
Sonja Smets .
Studia Logica, 2019, 107 :917-947
[30]   Abductive logics in a belief revision framework [J].
Walliser B. ;
Zwirn D. ;
Zwirn H. .
Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 2005, 14 (1) :87-117