“That is why I have trust”: unpacking what ‘trust’ means to participants in international genetic research in Pakistan and Denmark

被引:0
作者
Zainab Sheikh
Klaus Hoeyer
机构
[1] University of Copenhagen,Department of Public Health, Centre for Medical Science and Technology Studies
来源
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy | 2018年 / 21卷
关键词
Denmark; Pakistan; Trust; Genetic research; Data sharing; Collaborative research;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Trust features prominently in a number of policy documents that have been issued in recent years to facilitate data sharing and international collaboration in medical research. However, it often remains unclear what is meant by ‘trust’. By exploring a concrete international collaboration between Denmark and Pakistan, we develop a way of unpacking trust that shifts focus from what trust ‘is’ to what people invest in relationships and what references to trust do for them in these relationships. Based on interviews in both Pakistan and Denmark with people who provide blood samples and health data for the same laboratory, we find that when participants discuss trust they are trying to shape their relationship to researchers while simultaneously communicating important hopes, fears and expectations. The types of trust people talk about are never unconditional, but involve awareness of uncertainties and risks. There are different things at stake for people in different contexts, and therefore it is not the same to trust researchers in Pakistan as it is in Denmark, even when participants donate to the same laboratory. We conclude that casual references to ‘trust’ in policy documents risk glossing over important local differences and contribute to a de-politicization of basic inequalities in access to healthcare.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 179
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Aitken M(2016)Moving from trust to trustworthiness: Experiences of public engagement in the Scottish Health Informatics Programme Science and Public Policy 43 713-723
  • [2] Appelbaum PS(1987)False hopes and best data: Consent to research and the therapeutic misconception The Hastings Center report 17 20-24
  • [3] Baier A(1986)Trust and antitrust Ethics 96 231-260
  • [4] Busby H(2006)Consent, trust and ethics: Reflections on the findings of an interview based study with people donating blood for genetic research for research within the NHS Clinical Ethics 1 211-215
  • [5] Bussey-Jones J(2010)The role of race and trust in tissue/blood donation for genetic research Genetics in Medicine 12 116-121
  • [6] Critchley C(2015)The impact of commercialisation and genetic data sharing arrangements on public trust and the intention to participate in biobank research Public Health Genomics 18 160-172
  • [7] Nicol D(2006)Public knowledge and public trust Community Genetics 9 204-210
  • [8] Otlowski M(2008)Bioethics and the sociology of trust: Introduction to the theme Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 11 377-379
  • [9] Cunningham-Burley S(2011)Ethical issues in human genomics research in developing countries BMC Medical Ethics 12 1-5
  • [10] De Vries R(2011)Access and use of human tissues from the developing world: Ethical challenges and a way forward using a tissue trust BMC Medical Ethics 12 1-5