Demonstration lessons in mathematics education: Teachers' observation foci and intended changes in practice

被引:6
作者
Clarke D. [1 ]
Roche A. [1 ]
Wilkie K. [1 ]
Wright V. [1 ]
Brown J. [1 ]
Downton A. [1 ]
Horne M. [1 ]
Knight R. [1 ]
McDonough A. [1 ]
Sexton M. [1 ]
Worrall C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Australian Catholic University, Melbourne
关键词
Demonstration lessons; Observations; Pedagogical content knowledge; Student learning; Teacher change; Teacher professional learning;
D O I
10.1007/s13394-012-0058-z
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
As part of a teacher professional learning project in mathematics education, university mathematics educators taught demonstration lessons in project primary schools. These lessons were part of a "pre-brief, teaching, and debrief" process, in which up to eight teachers observed each lesson. Using brief questionnaires completed in advance of the lesson, during the lesson, following the debrief, and several weeks later, data were collected on teachers' intended and actual observation foci and any anticipated changes in their beliefs and practices arising from the experience. There were several common themes in teachers' intended observations, including a focus on questioning, catering for individual differences, and building student engagement. As evident in other research, teachers' intended and actual observations gave greater attention to teacher actions and decision making than to student learning and thinking. In this paper, we situate demonstration lessons within teacher professional learning models, describe the features of our model, summarise teacher data, and discuss issues arising from our work. © 2012 Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 230
页数:23
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Ball D.L., Bass H., Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach: knowing and using mathematics, Multiple Perspectives on Learning and Teaching, pp. 83-104, (2000)
[2]  
Ball D.L., Thames M.H., Phelps G., Content knowledge for teaching: what makes it special?, Journal of Teacher Education, 59, pp. 389-407, (2008)
[3]  
Bazeley P., Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo, (2007)
[4]  
Borko H., Jacobs J., Eiteljorg E., Pittman M.E., Video as a tool for fostering productive discussions in mathematics professional development, Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, pp. 417-436, (2008)
[5]  
Boyle B., Lamprianou I., Boyle T., A longitudinal study of teacher change: what makes professional development effective? Report of the second year of the study, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16, 1, pp. 1-27, (2005)
[6]  
Bruce C.D., Ross J., Flynn T., McPherson R., Lesson study and demonstration classrooms: Examining the effects of two models of teacher professional development, (2009)
[7]  
Butler D.L., Lauscher H.N., Jarvis-Selinger S., Beckingham B., Collaboration and self regulation in teachers' professional development, Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, pp. 435-455, (2004)
[8]  
Clarke D.M., Ten key principles from research for the professional development of mathematics teachers, Professional Development for Teachers of Mathematics (56th Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics), pp. 37-48, (1994)
[9]  
Clarke D.M., Clarke B.A., Mathematics teaching in grades k-2: painting a picture of challenging, supportive, and effective classrooms, Perspectives on the Teaching of Mathematics (66th Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics), pp. 67-81, (2004)
[10]  
Clarke D., Hollingworth H., Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth, Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, pp. 947-967, (2002)