Structural Constraints in the Evolution of the Tetrapod Skull Complexity: Williston’s Law Revisited Using Network Models

被引:0
作者
Borja Esteve-Altava
Jesús Marugán-Lobón
Héctor Botella
Diego Rasskin-Gutman
机构
[1] University of Valencia,Theoretical Biology Research Group, Institute Cavanilles for Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology
[2] Universidad Autónoma de Madrid,Unidad de Paleontología, Dpto. Biología
[3] University of Valencia,Area de Paleontología, Dpto. Geología
来源
Evolutionary Biology | 2013年 / 40卷
关键词
Morphological complexity; Constraints; Network theory; Tetrapod skull;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Ever since the appearance of the first land vertebrates, the skull has undergone a simplification by loss and fusion of bones in all major groups. This well-documented evolutionary trend is known as “Williston’s Law”. Both loss and fusion of bones are developmental events that generate, at large evolutionary scales, a net reduction in the number of skull bones. We reassess this evolutionary trend by analyzing the patterns of skull organization captured in network models in which nodes represent bones and links represent suture joints. We also evaluate the compensatory process of anisomerism (bone specialization) suggested to occur as a result of this reduction by quantifying the heterogeneity and the ratio of unpaired bones in real skulls. Finally, we perform simulations to test the differential effect of bone losses in skull evolution. We show that the reduction in bone number during evolution is accompanied by a trend toward a more complex organization, rather than toward simplification. Our results indicate that the processes by which bones are lost or fused during development are central to explain the evolution of the morphology of the skull. Our simulations suggest that the evolutionary trend of increasing morphological complexity can be caused as a result of a structural constraint, the systematic loss of less connected bones during development.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 219
页数:10
相关论文
共 138 条
[1]  
Albert R(2000)Error and attack tolerance of complex networks Nature 406 378-381
[2]  
Jeong H(2002)Central nervous system phenotypes in craniosynostosis Journal of Anatomy 201 31-39
[3]  
Barabási A-L(1936)The cranial morpholgy of some titanosuchid deinocephalians Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 72 99-116
[4]  
Aldridge K(1985)Cranial anatomy of the primitive reptile Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 22 1571-1587
[5]  
Marsh JL(1904)The osteology of the skull of the pelycosaurian genus, Journal of Geology 12 304-311
[6]  
Govier D(2008)Food-web structure and network theory: The role of connectance and size Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 12917-12922
[7]  
Richtsmeier JT(2008)Compilation and network analyses of Cambrian food webs PLoS Biology 6 e102-297
[8]  
Boonstra LD(1959)Cranial anatomy of the cynodont reptile On random graphs. Publicationes mathematicae Debrecen 6 290-180
[9]  
Carroll RL(1961)Network models in anatomical systems Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 125 165-10
[10]  
Lindsay W(2011)Phylogenies and the comparative method Journal of Anathropological Sciences 89 1-15